Vastuvõetud arvamused on 17/03/2010
Viide:
SOC/350-EESC-2010-448Rapporteur:
Täiskogu istungjärk:
461 -
Mar 17, 2010 Mar 18, 2010
Sooline võrdõiguslikkus
Displaying 11 - 20 of 44
Pages
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 15/10/2014
Viide:
SOC/502-EESC-2014-0625Rapporteur:
Täiskogu istungjärk:
502 -
Oct 15, 2014 Oct 16, 2014
Europe 2020 and Horizon 2020 goals will not be reached without stronger input from female scientists. Today, only 20% of all professors and just 10% of university vice-chancellors are women. This issue is constantly raised by both civil society and EU institutions, yet there is a lack of focus on this topic. The opinion aims to analyse the reasons for the gender gap in science (especially in STEM fields) and tackle the main obstacles to gender equality in science. It will provide a thorough analysis of the education and science sectors in the EU in relation to gender and make recommendations to ensure the appropriate talent allocation, which will increase Europe’s talent pool, promote employability and innovation and benefit the economy.
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 16/10/2014
Viide:
SOC/508-EESC-2014-1456Rapporteur:
Täiskogu istungjärk:
502 -
Oct 15, 2014 Oct 16, 2014
This opinion aims at exploring the obstacles to overcome and the conditions for developing quality services for the family in order to create decent and attractive jobs.
Previous work on the professionalisation of domestic work and on a family policy that tackles the challenge of demographic change need to be continued and updated by: revealing and describing the nature of the obstacles currently blocking the development and professionalisation of these jobs which; and making known positive experiences and good practices being implemented today in a number of Member States and major companies.
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 10/12/2003
Viide:
SOC/151-EESC-2003-1616Referral:
COM(2003) 279 final – 2003/0109 (COD)Rapporteur:
Ms Wahrolin
Täiskogu istungjärk:
404 -
Dec 10, 2003 Dec 11, 2003
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 15/12/2004
Viide:
SOC/157-EESC-2004-1641Referral:
(COM(2004) 279 final – 2004/0084 (COD))Rapporteur:
Täiskogu istungjärk:
413 -
Dec 15, 2004 Dec 16, 2004
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 21/01/2015
Viide:
SOC/513-EESC-2014-04856-00-00-ac-traRapporteur:
Täiskogu istungjärk:
504 -
Jan 21, 2015 Jan 22, 2015
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 25/01/2017
Viide:
SOC/542-EESC-01902-00-04-acRapporteur:
Krawczyk (Employers - GR I / Poland), Bischoff (Workers - GR II / Germany), Jahier (Various interests - GR III / Italy)
Täiskogu istungjärk:
522 -
Jan 25, 2017 Jan 26, 2017
The EESC adopted this opinion after in-depth work carried out during the four meetings of the study group. The opinion also reflects the national debates with civil society organisations carried out in all Member States between 2 September and 2 November 2016. These discussions were coordinated by three members of the EESC ('trios') from the country concerned, often in cooperation with the European Commission (15 debates) or the national economic and social council (7 debates). Participants came from a wide range of employers' and trade union organisations and other civil society organisations, as well as, to a lesser extent, from the academic world. A total of 116 EESC members and nearly 1,800 representatives of civil society organisations participated in the 28 debates. The conclusions/recommendations of the national debates have been grouped in the opinion, while the reports on the national debates will be published separately.
Downloads:
Vastuvõetud arvamused on 14/12/2005
Viide:
SOC/215-EESC-2005-1507Referral:
[COM(2005) 225 final – 2005/0107 (COD)]Rapporteur:
Mária Herczog
Täiskogu istungjärk:
422 -
Dec 14, 2005 Dec 15, 2005