Opinions

Pages

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2249
připravovaná stanoviska (updated on 03/07/2020)
Odkaz: 
NAT/785-EESC-2020

The opinion will provide guidance on how to build on existing structures like citizens' dialogues and assemblies, social dialogue committees in order to structure and mainstream the dialogue with civil society. It will also make recommendations about how to encourage information sharing and public understanding of climate action; how to create real and virtual spaces for exchange on climate and how to build capacity to facilitate grassroots initiatives, among others.

stanovisko sekce EHSV: European Climate Pact (Exploratory opinion)

připravovaná stanoviska (updated on 03/07/2020)
Odkaz: 
NAT/793-EESC-2020

The national provisions governing seed harvested and controlled in those countries afford the same assurances as the provisions applicable to seed harvested and controlled within the European Union as regards the seed's characteristics and the arrangements for :

  • its examination;
  • ensuring seed identification;
  • marking;
  • control.

Ukraine has submitted a request that its cereal seed is covered by Council Decision 2003/17/EC as equivalent.

stanovisko sekce EHSV: Seed equivalence - Ukraine

připravovaná stanoviska (updated on 03/07/2020)
Odkaz: 
NAT/784-EESC-2020

This EESC opinion will respond to the European Commission's proposal for a regulation on establishing a European Climate Law and it will look into the role of citizens in driving the transformation towards climate neutrality.

stanovisko sekce EHSV: European Climate Law

připravovaná stanoviska (updated on 03/07/2020)
Odkaz: 
SOC/652-EESC
Plenární zasedání: 
555 -
Oct 27, 2020 Oct 29, 2020
připravovaná stanoviska (updated on 02/07/2020)
Odkaz: 
ECO/523-EESC-2020-2020-02886

While acknowledging the progress made by the Commission in taking account of smaller and less complex banking institutions in its recent regulatory measures, the EESC believes it would be useful to further increase the proportionality of banking rules, without sacrificing the effectiveness of prudential rules.

The EESC endorses the recent decision to push back the date for implementing the Basel III accord, and feels that when the time comes, the new provision on capital requirements should be transposed in a way that caters properly for the diversity of banking business models in Europe.

Pages