Ligestilling mellem kønnene
Displaying 21 - 30 of 44
Pages
Vedtaget on 16/10/2014
Reference:
SOC/508-EESC-2014-1456Rapporteur:
Plenarforsamling:
502 -
Oct 15, 2014 Oct 16, 2014
This opinion aims at exploring the obstacles to overcome and the conditions for developing quality services for the family in order to create decent and attractive jobs.
Previous work on the professionalisation of domestic work and on a family policy that tackles the challenge of demographic change need to be continued and updated by: revealing and describing the nature of the obstacles currently blocking the development and professionalisation of these jobs which; and making known positive experiences and good practices being implemented today in a number of Member States and major companies.
Vedtaget on 10/12/2003
Reference:
SOC/151-EESC-2003-1616Referral:
COM(2003) 279 final – 2003/0109 (COD)Rapporteur:
Ms Wahrolin
Plenarforsamling:
404 -
Dec 10, 2003 Dec 11, 2003
Vedtaget on 15/12/2004
Reference:
SOC/157-EESC-2004-1641Referral:
(COM(2004) 279 final – 2004/0084 (COD))Rapporteur:
Plenarforsamling:
413 -
Dec 15, 2004 Dec 16, 2004
Vedtaget on 21/01/2015
Reference:
SOC/513-EESC-2014-04856-00-00-ac-traRapporteur:
Plenarforsamling:
504 -
Jan 21, 2015 Jan 22, 2015
Vedtaget on 25/01/2017
Reference:
SOC/542-EESC-01902-00-04-acRapporteur:
Krawczyk (Employers - GR I / Poland), Bischoff (Workers - GR II / Germany), Jahier (Various interests - GR III / Italy)
Plenarforsamling:
522 -
Jan 25, 2017 Jan 26, 2017
The EESC adopted this opinion after in-depth work carried out during the four meetings of the study group. The opinion also reflects the national debates with civil society organisations carried out in all Member States between 2 September and 2 November 2016. These discussions were coordinated by three members of the EESC ('trios') from the country concerned, often in cooperation with the European Commission (15 debates) or the national economic and social council (7 debates). Participants came from a wide range of employers' and trade union organisations and other civil society organisations, as well as, to a lesser extent, from the academic world. A total of 116 EESC members and nearly 1,800 representatives of civil society organisations participated in the 28 debates. The conclusions/recommendations of the national debates have been grouped in the opinion, while the reports on the national debates will be published separately.
Downloads:
02/12/2019
EESC debate takes stock and discusses steps to take
24/09/2018
It needs different and holistic approaches to address gender inequality, says the EESC
The digital gender gap is a consequence of discrimination against women, which already starts in early childhood, the EESC points out. In its exploratory opinion on the digital gender gap, drafted at the European Parliament's request, the EESC suggests a multi-level approach and calls for holistic policies addressing different sources of inequality.
19/12/2018
Europe loses EUR 370 billion a year due to the gender employment gap. What's more, it is statistically proven that companies with more gender-diverse management boards produce better results. So, why might it take another 217 years to close the economic gender gap at global level, as estimated by the World Economic Forum? On 17 December, high-level speakers from the worlds of business, politics and NGOs came together with members of the Employers' Group to discuss how to leverage the immense potential that women could bring to the European economy.