Obrona i aeronautyka

This page is also available in:

  • Przyjęte on 18/09/2025 - Bureau decision date: 28/04/2025
    Sygnatura
    ECO/679-EESC-2025-01682
    Employers - GR I
    Poland
    Workers - GR II
    Romania
    Plenary session number
    599
    -

    The EESC emphasises that peace must remain a core EU priority and cautions against focusing solely on military threats while overlooking other serious risks to human life. It stresses the importance of diplomacy for conflict resolution and crisis prevention wherever possible.The EESC supports a comprehensive, inclusive European defence strategy that supplements military readiness with civil preparedness. It endorses the European Commission’s Joint white Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 and calls for a coordinated EU approach that treats defence, peace and security as shared public goods, underpinned by strong legal, institutional and financial frameworks with democratic oversight.

    Download — Opinia EKES-u: Defence-related investments in the EU budget
    • Record of proceedings ECO/679
  • W toku (updated on 22/11/2025) - Bureau decision date: 16/09/2025
    Sygnatura
    ECO/685-EESC-2025-2025-03305
    Employers - GR I
    Czech Republic
    Plenary session number
    601
    -
    Download — Opinia Sekcji: Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund
  • W toku (updated on 30/10/2025) - Bureau decision date: 15/07/2025
    Sygnatura
    ECO/683-EESC-2025-02552
    Workers - GR II
    Romania
    Employers - GR I
    Czech Republic
    Plenary session number
    Ses
    -
  • W toku (updated on 23/10/2025) - Bureau decision date: 17/06/2025
    Sygnatura
    ECO/682-EESC-2025-2025-02245
    Plenary session number
    Ses
    -
  • Przyjęte on 26/02/2025 - Bureau decision date: 17/09/2024
    Sygnatura
    ECO/655-EESC-2024
    Employers - GR I
    Poland
    Plenary session number
    594
    -

    In view of Europe's current security challenges, in particular with the armed conflict caused by Russia’s full-scale aggression against Ukraine, defence funding places a significant burden on the budgets of many EU Member States, worsening their fiscal position. 

    At the same time, the resources that Member States are currently able to allocate to the development of defence capabilities still seem to be insufficient. 

    As Europe needs to develop defence capabilities in a more integrated way, there is a need to significantly increase investment in European defence infrastructure and technological innovation to improve preparedness to respond to threats. 

    Download — Opinia EKES-u: Defence funding in the EU
    • Record of proceedings ECO/655
  • W toku (updated on 28/11/2025) - Bureau decision date: 16/01/2024
    Sygnatura
    TEN/835-EESC-2024
    Plenary session number
    601
    -
    Download — Opinia Sekcji: EU space act
  • Przyjęte on 12/07/2023 - Bureau decision date: 21/02/2023
    Sygnatura
    CCMI/215-EESC-2023-2023-01246
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Italy
    (Sweden
    Plenary session number
    580
    -

    In a geopolitical context of increasing power competition and intensification of threats to the EU and its Member States, EU leaders have identified space as a strategic domain in the Strategic Compass and have called for an EU Space Strategy for security and defence. The European Commission presented on 10 March such strategy aiming to enhancing the resilience and protection of space systems and services in the EU, responding to space threats, enhancing the use of space for security and defence and partnering for responsible behaviours in outer space.

    The preparatory meeting between the rapporteur, the corapporteur and the president of the study group is scheduled for 31 March. The first study group meeting and an expert hearing are scheduled for 3 May and the second study group meeting on 31 May. The document will go to CCMI meeting on 22 June and to EESC plenary on 12-13 July.

    Download — Opinia EKES-u: EU space strategy for security and defence
  • Przyjęte on 30/10/2019 - Bureau decision date: 14/05/2019
    Sygnatura
    ECO/496-EESC-2019-02530
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Malta

    The EESC supports the Commission's aim of ensuring equal treatment, for VAT purposes, for armed forces of Member States working together within an EU framework and NATO armed forces employed in the EU, which already benefit from VAT exemption. The Committee suggests that different national tax authorities should have one system under which the new exemptions are implemented.

    Download — Opinia EKES-u: VAT and excise duty exemption for defence efforts
  • Przyjęte on 07/12/2017 - Bureau decision date: 16/06/2017
    Sygnatura
    CCMI/154-EESC-2017
    (Italy
    (France

    The European defence policy was identified as a key political priority in President Juncker's political guidelines of July 2014. This should be also viewed in connection with the fact that after decades of peace and stability, the Union is facing increased instability and new emerging security threats. This changing security environment demonstrated in a clear way that only through joint efforts in investing in security development and cooperation at all levels can we deliver on the expectations of Union citizens and our partners. For Europe to take over more responsibility for its defence, it is crucial to improve competitiveness and enhance innovation across the Union defence industry.

    Download — Opinia EKES-u: European defence industrial development programme
  • Przyjęte on 07/12/2017 - Bureau decision date: 16/06/2017
    Sygnatura
    CCMI/155-EESC-2017
    (Romania
    (France

    Despite several initiatives over the past years, the landscape of the European defence industry is characterised by insufficient levels and quality of investment in the development and procurement of future capabilities. Member States are not cooperating enough, with more than 80% of procurement and more than 90% of Research and Technology run on a national basis. A high degree of fragmentation remains, with 178 different weapon systems in Europe compared to 30 in the US. Too little coordination in defence planning leads to an inefficient use of taxpayers' money, unnecessary duplication and suboptimal deployability of defence forces. There are wide differences in the level of defence spending between Member States. Enhanced solidarity, including through the involvement of the EU budget, is needed to deliver common defence capabilities.

    Download — Opinia EKES-u: European Defence Fund (Communication)