Lauksaimniecība

This page is also available in

Displaying 1 - 10 of 115

Pages

Pieņemtie on 04/05/2011
Atsauce: 
CCMI/80-EESC-2011-805

In the framework of this opinion a hearing (Agricultural machinery and construction and handling equipment: what is the best way out of the crisis?) was organized in Bologna, Italy, on 11 November 2010.

Agricultural machinery, construction and handling equipment: what is the best way out of the crisis?

Pieņemtie on 20/03/2013
Atsauce: 
NAT/570-EESC-2012-1917
Plenārsesija: 
488 -
Feb 20, 2013 Feb 21, 2013

Up to 50% of food gets wasted in EU households, supermarkets, restaurants and along the food supply chain each year, while 79 million EU citizens live beneath the poverty line and 16 million depend on food aid from charitable institutions. The proposed own-initiative opinion should give impetus to draw up at the European level a coordinated strategy, combining EU-wide and national measures, to improve the efficiency of food supply and consumption chains and to tackle food wastage as a matter of urgency.

Prevention and reduction of food waste

Pieņemtie on 08/09/2015
Atsauce: 
REX/439-EESC-2015
Plenārsesija: 
510 -
Sep 16, 2015 Sep 17, 2015

EESC opinion: Agriculture, Rural Areas and Sustainable Development in the Eastern Partnership Countries

Downloads: 

Assessment of the Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in the Eastern Partnership countries The Republic of Armenia

Assessment of the Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in the Eastern Partnership countries The Republic of Azerbaijan

Assessment of the Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in the Eastern Partnership countries Georgia

Assessment of the Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in the Eastern Partnership countries The Republic of Moldova

Assessment of the Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in the Eastern Partnership countries Ukraine

Towards good environmental governance in the eastern partnership countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine

Brochure EaP GREEN Project

ENPARD Georgia

Assessment of the Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors in the Eastern Partnership countries Regional report

CoR opinion: OPINION EU SUPPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE CHANGE IN TRANSITION SOCIETIES

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions: EU support for sustainable change in transition societies

Pieņemtie on 17/09/2015
Atsauce: 
NAT/662-EESC-2015-01349-00-03-AC-TRA
Plenārsesija: 
510 -
Sep 16, 2015 Sep 17, 2015

Opinion on The importance of agricultural trade for the future development of agriculture and farming in the EU in the context of global food security

EESC opinion: Agricultural trade/global food security

Downloads: 

Agricultural trade statistics

Pieņemtie on 25/04/2012
Atsauce: 
NAT/520-EESC-2012-1050
Plenārsesija: 
480 -
Apr 25, 2012 Apr 26, 2012

The European Economic and Social Committee greets the Commission's legislative proposals with interest, and notes that some – although far from all – recommendations made in its past opinions have been taken into account. Most importantly, the Committee has repeatedly stated that the future CAP must be driven by a determination to defend the European agricultural model, which is based on the principles of food sovereignty, sustainability and responsiveness to the real needs of farmers and consumers.

The EESC repeats that the European agricultural model cannot operate at world market prices and conditions and does not come free of charge. Any policy that promotes this agricultural model thus requires sufficient financial resources. However, in the current proposals concerning the Union budget for the 2014-2020 period, the resources earmarked for the CAP would be clearly reduced in constant price terms.

EESC Opinion: CAP towards 2020

Downloads: 

The EESC and the CAP Reform - Article

Summary (EESC Opinion: CAP towards 2020)

Pieņemtie on 19/10/2016
Atsauce: 
NAT/680-EESC-2016-01870-00-00-ac-tra
Plenārsesija: 
520 -
Oct 19, 2016 Oct 20, 2016

Over recent years, there has been a shift in bargaining power in the food supply chain, mostly to the advantage of the retail sector and some transnational companies and to the detriment of suppliers, in particular primary producers. The concentration of bargaining power has led to the abuse of positions of dominance causing weaker operators to become increasingly vulnerable to Unfair Trading Practices (UTPs). The opinion takes stock of the impact of UTPs, stresses the difficult position of the most vulnerable actors along the chain and calls for action at EU level to stop UTPs and promote a fairer food supply chain.

EESC opinion: Promoting a fairer agro-food supply chain

Pages