Растеж

This page is also available in

Displaying 21 - 30 of 204

Pages

Приети on 30/04/2014
Референтен номер: 
CCMI/118-EESC-2013-5662

The EESC stresses that a real growth strategy at EU and national level is needed to support the creation of better and more stable jobs for young people.

Employability of young people – matching training with industry needs in an age of austerity

Приети on 17/09/2015
Референтен номер: 
ECO/380-EESC-2015-01820-00-01-ac-tra
Пленарна сесия: 
510 -
Sep 16, 2015 Sep 17, 2015

A genuine stabilisation of the economic and monetary union (EMU) can only succeed if the deficits in the EMU architecture are solved and to this end major reforms are undertaken. The longer the current austerity policy continues, that primarily looks at spending cuts without the addition of an effective investment plan and measures to enhance income through growth, social cohesion and solidarity, it will become increasingly clear that Europe's economic integration and prosperity is at risk from growing social inequalities. The EESC calls for greater "parliamentarisation" of the euro area, with a grand EP committee comprising all members of parliament from the euro area and from those countries wishing to join (26 Member States), combined with stronger coordination of members of parliament from the euro area on EMU issues (COSAC +).

EESC opinion: The community method for a democratic and social EMU

Приети on 17/03/2016
Референтен номер: 
ECO/393-EESC-2015-06357-00-00-ac-tra
Пленарна сесия: 
515 -
Mar 16, 2016 Mar 17, 2016

The introduction of further risk sharing is to be accompanied by further risk reduction in the Banking Union. Both the EDIS and the relevant risk reduction measures have to be dealt with in parallel and without delay and actually put into effect. An EDIS will have a positive impact on the situation of individual Member States and banks by being more able to cushion local shocks. This may discourage speculation against specific countries or banks, thus reducing the risk of bank runs. At the same time it will further weaken the link between the banks and their national sovereigns. It is imperative that the existing legislative framework of the Banking Union is fully implemented by all Member States. It is important that the Commission carry out a comprehensive in-depth impact study in order to further strengthen the legitimacy of the proposal.

EESC opinion: European Deposit Insurance Scheme

Приети on 26/01/2017
Референтен номер: 
TEN/611-EESC-2016
Пленарна сесия: 
522 -
Jan 25, 2017 Jan 26, 2017
  • The EESC welcomes the Communication from the Commission confirming the importance of Internet connectivity for the Digital Single Market and the need for Europe to deploy now the networks for its digital future.
  • The EESC notes that the Strategic Objectives for 2025 are ambitious but realistic, although they are largely dependent on national funding (private and public). There is a particular need for public investments to cover all remotes areas and guarantee minimum digital access for the vulnerable members of our society.
  • The EESC agrees with the proposal to introduce a voucher system for small communities and SMEs and supports the free "WIFI4EU" initiative for all Europeans in public places, public administrations, libraries and hospitals as well as outdoor spaces even. It recommends following eIDAS digital identity, which offers guarantees for data protection and public security against.

EESC opinion: European Gigabit Society

Приети on 17/10/2018
Референтен номер: 
ECO/475-EESC-2018-02936-00-00
Пленарна сесия: 
538 -
Oct 17, 2018 Oct 18, 2018

The EESC agrees with the aims of the Council Recommendation and with some of its proposals. However, it expresses its disagreement with the proposal for the aggregate fiscal stance of the euro area to be neutral, as well as with the way that the recommendation on salaries is formulated.

 

EESC opinion: Euro area economic policy 2018 (additional opinion)

Приети on 17/07/2019
Референтен номер: 
ECO/491-EESC-2019-00699
Пленарна сесия: 
545 -
Jul 17, 2019 Jul 18, 2019

The EESC supports the Commission's ambition to kick-start a necessary debate, given the sensitivities of Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) in tax matters. At the same time, the EESC considers that there are certain conditions that would need to be met for QMV to be successfully implemented. The EESC is aware that tax policy has always been closely linked to the sovereignty of Member States, as it is of utmost importance to them.

Following in-depth economic, social and fiscal analysis, any new rule must be fit-for-purpose and all Member States must at all times have sufficient possibilities to participate in the decision-making process. Creating an advantageous outcome both at the EU level and at the level of the individual Member State should be the ultimate objective.

 

EESC opinion: Taxation – qualified majority voting

Приети on 24/05/2012
Референтен номер: 
ECO/308-EESC-2012-1299
Пленарна сесия: 
481 -
May 23, 2012 May 24, 2012

The Committee reiterates that the ambitious challenges facing the EU make it not only desirable but also necessary to increase the size of the EU budget so as to revitalise economic growth and employment. Furthermore, it welcomes the moves to improve and simplify the structure of the EU budget, so as to substantially deflate the issues of fair return and horizontal fairness between the Member States, focusing instead on effectively achieving Europe's strategic objectives. The EU budget should be exemplary, efficient, effective and transparent, so that it gains credibility in the eyes of the European public.

EESC opinion: Budget 2014-2020

Приети on 14/12/2016
Референтен номер: 
ECO/417-EESC-2016-05349-00-02-ac-tra
Пленарна сесия: 
521 -
Dec 14, 2016 Dec 15, 2016

EESC opinion: Mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020

Downloads: 

Mid term review of the MFF - towards a simpler and more flexible single rule book for the EU budget - Tobias Lambeck, European Commission

EMFF 2014-2020 - Mid-term review-revision - Thilo Maurer, European Commission

MFF review - presentation by rapporteur Mr Palmieri

Pages