European Economic
and Social Committee
An Investment Plan for Europe
Key points:
The EESC welcomes the Investment Plan for Europe and appreciates the change of tone away from austerity and fiscal consolidation.
The Investment Plan is a step into the right direction but it does face a number of serious questions about its size, about the high degree of leverage expected, about the potential flow of investment projects, about the marketing strategy for attracting private capital, about the involvement of SMEs and about the Plan’s timescale.
There is uncertainty about whether a pipeline of projects can be developed that offer returns that attract institutional investors. The EESC strongly recommends involving the social partners and organised civil society in the project identification process at national level.
Much greater attention must be paid to establish a conducive and predictable investment environment.
The Plan proposes that contributions to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) from Member States will not be included in budget deficit calculations and this is to be welcomed, but the Commission should explain why ongoing strategic public infrastructure expenditures are not treated in the same way.
Strategic public investment such as that envisaged in the Plan which underpins present and future economic development should be incentivised by a more benign European fiscal framework. The EESC invites the Commission to open a discussion on a properly formulated fiscal rule for Europe in full recognition of its many definitional difficulties and in the setting of appropriate conditionalities.
The EESC calls on the Commission to take into consideration the ILO recommendations on attracting viable projects from the regions with the highest unemployment rates, and recommends that the macro-regional strategies are taken into consideration when identifying and assessing potential projects.
Downloads
-
Achim Truger - Implementing the Golden Rule for Public Investment in Europe
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HLAVNÉ BODY EHSV: usúdil, že návrh je uspokojivý a nie sú k nemu potrebné žiadne pripomienky, rozhodol sa zaujať k predkladanému textu kladné stanovisko.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HLAVNÉ BODY EHSV: sa domnieva, že plán Európskej komisie REPowerEU je krokom správnym smerom k tomu, aby sa EÚ stala nezávislá od ruských dodávok plynu a ropy, poukazuje na to, že…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuálna a kolektívna vlastná spotreba energie ako faktor v boji za zelenú a energetickú transformáciu a hospodársku a sociálnu rovnováhu Hlavné body EHSV: sa domnieva, že miestne a…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Zohľadňovanie spravodlivosti a efektívnosti v námornej deprave Hlavné body EHSV: zdôrazňuje, že zelená transformácia odvetvia lodnej dopravy musí zohľadňovať charakteristiky špecifické pre…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prechod na dlhodobo udržateľný dopravný systém HLAVNÉ BODY EHSV: sa domnieva, že občania a podniky budú aktívne podporovať prechod na dlhodobo udržateľný dopravný systém len…