European Economic
and Social Committee
An Investment Plan for Europe
Key points:
The EESC welcomes the Investment Plan for Europe and appreciates the change of tone away from austerity and fiscal consolidation.
The Investment Plan is a step into the right direction but it does face a number of serious questions about its size, about the high degree of leverage expected, about the potential flow of investment projects, about the marketing strategy for attracting private capital, about the involvement of SMEs and about the Plan’s timescale.
There is uncertainty about whether a pipeline of projects can be developed that offer returns that attract institutional investors. The EESC strongly recommends involving the social partners and organised civil society in the project identification process at national level.
Much greater attention must be paid to establish a conducive and predictable investment environment.
The Plan proposes that contributions to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) from Member States will not be included in budget deficit calculations and this is to be welcomed, but the Commission should explain why ongoing strategic public infrastructure expenditures are not treated in the same way.
Strategic public investment such as that envisaged in the Plan which underpins present and future economic development should be incentivised by a more benign European fiscal framework. The EESC invites the Commission to open a discussion on a properly formulated fiscal rule for Europe in full recognition of its many definitional difficulties and in the setting of appropriate conditionalities.
The EESC calls on the Commission to take into consideration the ILO recommendations on attracting viable projects from the regions with the highest unemployment rates, and recommends that the macro-regional strategies are taken into consideration when identifying and assessing potential projects.
Downloads
-
Achim Truger - Implementing the Golden Rule for Public Investment in Europe
Recommended for you
Gender-based investments in national recovery and resilience plans
Opinion
Key points The EESC: points out that most of the national recovery and resilience plans (NRRPs) have been drawn up by the Member States without an ex-ante assessment of the impact of individual…
Gender-based investments in national Recovery and Resilience Plans
Event
The negative impact of the COVID-19 crisis on women's social and economic situations triggered a debate on the urgent need for a gender-sensitive policy response to the pandemic. In this context…
Gender-based investments in national Recovery and Resilience Plans
Agenda
09.30-11.00 - Public hearing with EESC members and invited guests from Civil Society Organisations, organised by the Section for Economic & Monetary Union-Economic & Cohesion Policy;(ECO)…
RESourceEU plan
Opinion
Key points - RESourceEU Action Plan
Retail investment package
Opinion
Key points The EESC: takes note of the Commission's decision not to propose a full ban on inducements, however, it welcomes the explicit Commission statements that there are potential conflicts of…