European Economic
and Social Committee
Interview with co-authors of EESC study 'Breaking the cycle of disadvantage - Reviewing EU policy through the lens of poverty'
We spoke with Matthew Geraci, Miia-Mari Paavonaho, Anaëlle Becker, Jennifer McGuinn, Júlia Zomignani Barboza, Fran Gallego Osorio, and Flore Gustave, Millieu Consulting co-authors of the new EESC study, requested by the EESC’s Civil Society Organisations’ Group.
What is this study about and why is the topic relevant?
The study Breaking the cycle of disadvantage - Reviewing EU policy through the lens of poverty looks at poverty with a specific lens, seeing it not as something static, that simply reflects one point in an individual’s life, but as something dynamic, that is transmitted between generations and shaped by the wider family and social environment. That’s what we call intergenerational poverty (IGP). The EU has mostly tended to treat poverty as a snapshot rather than a cycle, however, as disadvantage doesn’t stay still but instead travels across generations, it is important to look at it from an intergenerational perspective to be able to tackle its multiple root causes (or problem drivers, as we refer to them in our study).
What are the study’s main findings?
This study covers a lot of ground, but the findings that really surprised us emerged from the mapping of the EU policy framework. Overall, we found a strong policy focus on education, employment prospects and income, but at the same time a weaker emphasis on health, housing, social protection, gender inequality and access to essential services. What we found particularly striking was that, when viewing the EU policy framework through the lens of the problem drivers of IGP – the factors responsible for perpetuating poverty across generations – ‘low parental education’ was scarcely represented among the EU policies we assessed. This was largely due to the fact that many EU policies frame education in terms of labour market activation, with instruments supporting adult learning and upskilling for employment rather than recognising the role that a parent’s education plays in shaping not only their own but also their children’s life chances (details on page 58 of the study).
How can the study help decision-makers in implementing the EU Anti-Poverty Strategy?
We think that several of the study’s recommendations could meaningfully advance the EU Anti-Poverty Strategy’s objectives, and they can be viewed as working through two channels.
The first is at the level of EU policy. As many of the necessary policy instruments are already in place, what is needed is not fundamentally new policies, but rather a refocusing of existing ones. For instance, we recommend that the European Commission encourage Member States to rebalance education measures under EU funding instruments to better account for the needs of vulnerable parents and young families. We also propose that child rights impact assessments be used in the design of education and social policy to widen the focus towards children and their life chances.
The second channel of recommendations is through research. Our study also presents a framework that EU institutions could use to assess the potential impacts of future policies on IGP at the design stage. While the results would not be immediate, if adopted, it could better integrate IGP considerations across the EU policy framework over the long term.
What should be the focus of future research?
Designing the right policies can only happen if we properly measure and monitor IGP. Decision-makers need a clear picture of how disadvantage is passed from one generation to the next and where action is most needed. Future research should therefore explore how poverty persists across generations in different countries and which indicators are best for tracking it. It should also look beyond income, considering factors such as family instability, stigma, discrimination and psychological impacts, while addressing data gaps concerning groups often missing from poverty statistics, such as Roma people, homeless people and undocumented migrants.
The study can be found on our dedicated website, which also includes an executive summary. Read our press release on the study.

Work organisation
Recommended for you
YEYS! 2023: Jongeren vragen een EU die transparanter, digitaler en eenvoudiger is
News
Op 23 en 24 maart is bij het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité (EESC) de veertiende editie van Jouw Europa, jouw mening! (YEYS!) gehouden. Voor dat evenement kwamen 105 leerlingen van 35 scholen…
De elektriciteitsmarkt van de EU moet worden hervormd
News
Uit een door het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité (EESC) georganiseerd debat kwam naar voren dat het van cruciaal belang is de Europese elektriciteitsmarkt aan te passen om de zwakke punten…
Kandidaten kunnen zich nu aanmelden voor de EESC-prijs voor het maatschappelijk middenveld, die dit jaar geestelijke gezondheid als thema heeft
News
Maatschappelijke organisaties, individuen en particuliere ondernemingen kunnen nu met hun non-profitprojecten meedingen naar de EESC-prijs voor het maatschappelijk middenveld, die deze keer in het…
EESC roept de EU-burgers op om in juni 2024 te stemmen voor een verenigd en democratisch Europa
News
Tegen de achtergrond van een wereldwijde achteruitgang van de democratie, welig tierende desinformatie, groeiende ontevredenheid, stijgende inflatie en oorlogsdreiging, staat er veel op het spel bij…
De sociale en burgerdialoog kunnen de EU helpen duurzaam te groeien
News
Slechts enkele dagen na de Europese verkiezingen van 2024 kwamen het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité (EESC) en de nationale sociaal-economische raden van de EU bijeen om de stand van zaken van…