European Economic
and Social Committee
Interview with co-authors of EESC study 'Breaking the cycle of disadvantage - Reviewing EU policy through the lens of poverty'
We spoke with Matthew Geraci, Miia-Mari Paavonaho, Anaëlle Becker, Jennifer McGuinn, Júlia Zomignani Barboza, Fran Gallego Osorio, and Flore Gustave, Millieu Consulting co-authors of the new EESC study, requested by the EESC’s Civil Society Organisations’ Group.
What is this study about and why is the topic relevant?
The study Breaking the cycle of disadvantage - Reviewing EU policy through the lens of poverty looks at poverty with a specific lens, seeing it not as something static, that simply reflects one point in an individual’s life, but as something dynamic, that is transmitted between generations and shaped by the wider family and social environment. That’s what we call intergenerational poverty (IGP). The EU has mostly tended to treat poverty as a snapshot rather than a cycle, however, as disadvantage doesn’t stay still but instead travels across generations, it is important to look at it from an intergenerational perspective to be able to tackle its multiple root causes (or problem drivers, as we refer to them in our study).
What are the study’s main findings?
This study covers a lot of ground, but the findings that really surprised us emerged from the mapping of the EU policy framework. Overall, we found a strong policy focus on education, employment prospects and income, but at the same time a weaker emphasis on health, housing, social protection, gender inequality and access to essential services. What we found particularly striking was that, when viewing the EU policy framework through the lens of the problem drivers of IGP – the factors responsible for perpetuating poverty across generations – ‘low parental education’ was scarcely represented among the EU policies we assessed. This was largely due to the fact that many EU policies frame education in terms of labour market activation, with instruments supporting adult learning and upskilling for employment rather than recognising the role that a parent’s education plays in shaping not only their own but also their children’s life chances (details on page 58 of the study).
How can the study help decision-makers in implementing the EU Anti-Poverty Strategy?
We think that several of the study’s recommendations could meaningfully advance the EU Anti-Poverty Strategy’s objectives, and they can be viewed as working through two channels.
The first is at the level of EU policy. As many of the necessary policy instruments are already in place, what is needed is not fundamentally new policies, but rather a refocusing of existing ones. For instance, we recommend that the European Commission encourage Member States to rebalance education measures under EU funding instruments to better account for the needs of vulnerable parents and young families. We also propose that child rights impact assessments be used in the design of education and social policy to widen the focus towards children and their life chances.
The second channel of recommendations is through research. Our study also presents a framework that EU institutions could use to assess the potential impacts of future policies on IGP at the design stage. While the results would not be immediate, if adopted, it could better integrate IGP considerations across the EU policy framework over the long term.
What should be the focus of future research?
Designing the right policies can only happen if we properly measure and monitor IGP. Decision-makers need a clear picture of how disadvantage is passed from one generation to the next and where action is most needed. Future research should therefore explore how poverty persists across generations in different countries and which indicators are best for tracking it. It should also look beyond income, considering factors such as family instability, stigma, discrimination and psychological impacts, while addressing data gaps concerning groups often missing from poverty statistics, such as Roma people, homeless people and undocumented migrants.
The study can be found on our dedicated website, which also includes an executive summary. Read our press release on the study.

Work organisation
Recommended for you
Tetyana Ogarkova: "The day of victory will come but it will not bring normality back"
Agenda
On 24 February 2022, the lives of millions of Ukrainians were turned upside down. Now, when we say the word "victory", we expect that day to be the way things used to be. A normal day, a day of peace…
Lutte contre la précarité énergétique: garantir un approvisionnement énergétique abordable devrait figurer au premier rang des priorités politiques des pays de l’UE
News
Alors que le nombre de ménages qui sont dans l’incapacité de chauffer leur logement va vraisemblablement augmenter dans l’Union, avec une inflation annuelle de l’énergie qui dépasse 40 %, il y a…
Les zones rurales ont le potentiel pour produire davantage de résultats
News
Si l’attrait de la vie à la campagne s’est accru ces toutes dernières années, de nombreuses zones rurales de l’Union restent confrontées à un certain nombre de problèmes qui dissuadent les personnes…
Pour lutter contre le sans-abrisme, il faut une approche globale et une action collective
News
Le 7 octobre dernier, le Comité économique et social européen (CESE) a tenu une conférence sur le sans-abrisme et les moyens d’éradiquer ce phénomène d’ici à 2030, en appliquant le principe du…
Un rôle actif pour la société civile organisée est essentiel à la résilience de l’Union européenne
News
Le CESE a tenu un débat en session plénière sur l’importance croissante de la société civile organisée et des villes pour mettre l’Europe en capacité de faire face aux chocs asymétriques et aux…