European Economic
and Social Committee
Evaluation of Common Agricultural Policy delivery on its objectives
Key points
Based on the data collected during the evaluation process through both meetings with national stakeholders and a targeted online questionnaire, the EESC recommends:
- that direct payments and overall CAP funding must be increased and index-linked to counter inflation, rising costs and market volatility;
- maintaining a two-pillar CAP, with Pillar 1 covering support for farm incomes through direct payments and market supports and Pillar 2 covering rural development and support for rural areas;
- strengthening farmers’ position in the food supply chain and enhancing price transparency;
- strengthening producer organisations, increasing enforcement of laws on unfair trading practices and ensuring strong equivalence of standards in trade policy;
- improving and increasing generational renewal, providing support for women and part-time farmers and providing long-term policy stability;
- introducing or expanding targeted financial and structural incentives, specifically for women farmers and women-led projects, like the Irish and Spanish ‘gender-targeted measures’;
- setting more ambitious environmental goals with proportionate incentives, and introducing eco-schemes that are more flexible, tailored to each region and accompanied by suitable compensation and targeted advisory services;
- expanding social conditionality to high-risk sectors, such as horticulture, and to migrant/seasonal workers, while carefully assessing and addressing concerns raised by farmers, employer groups, and national administrations, regarding the mechanism’s effectiveness and its potential to increase administrative burden without delivering clear social benefits to the sector;
- simplifying the administrative burden, particularly at farm level, while preserving accountability, and reducing the bureaucratic burden by adhering to the ‘once only’ principle;
- increasing support for LEADER and local development measures. Ring-fencing funding, reducing administrative complexity and integrating more farm-centred and agri-food projects to foster inclusive rural economies;
- improving civil society engagement and establishing permanent joint responsibility frameworks, more effective consultation periods and transparent feedback mechanisms;
- ensuring that CAP support does not go to company head offices outside the EU;
- proposing specific support measures for farmers to ensure good living conditions for seasonal workers.
Downloads
-
Technical Annex NAT968
-
Record of proceedings NAT/968
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
De transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de lange termijn HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: meent dat burgers en bedrijven de transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de…