European Economic
and Social Committee
Evaluation of Common Agricultural Policy delivery on its objectives
Key points
Based on the data collected during the evaluation process through both meetings with national stakeholders and a targeted online questionnaire, the EESC recommends:
- that direct payments and overall CAP funding must be increased and index-linked to counter inflation, rising costs and market volatility;
- maintaining a two-pillar CAP, with Pillar 1 covering support for farm incomes through direct payments and market supports and Pillar 2 covering rural development and support for rural areas;
- strengthening farmers’ position in the food supply chain and enhancing price transparency;
- strengthening producer organisations, increasing enforcement of laws on unfair trading practices and ensuring strong equivalence of standards in trade policy;
- improving and increasing generational renewal, providing support for women and part-time farmers and providing long-term policy stability;
- introducing or expanding targeted financial and structural incentives, specifically for women farmers and women-led projects, like the Irish and Spanish ‘gender-targeted measures’;
- setting more ambitious environmental goals with proportionate incentives, and introducing eco-schemes that are more flexible, tailored to each region and accompanied by suitable compensation and targeted advisory services;
- expanding social conditionality to high-risk sectors, such as horticulture, and to migrant/seasonal workers, while carefully assessing and addressing concerns raised by farmers, employer groups, and national administrations, regarding the mechanism’s effectiveness and its potential to increase administrative burden without delivering clear social benefits to the sector;
- simplifying the administrative burden, particularly at farm level, while preserving accountability, and reducing the bureaucratic burden by adhering to the ‘once only’ principle;
- increasing support for LEADER and local development measures. Ring-fencing funding, reducing administrative complexity and integrating more farm-centred and agri-food projects to foster inclusive rural economies;
- improving civil society engagement and establishing permanent joint responsibility frameworks, more effective consultation periods and transparent feedback mechanisms;
- ensuring that CAP support does not go to company head offices outside the EU;
- proposing specific support measures for farmers to ensure good living conditions for seasonal workers.
Downloads
-
Technical Annex NAT968
-
Record of proceedings NAT/968
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK: remdamasis tuo, kad pasiūlymas yra visiškai priimtinas ir kad dėl jo neturi pastabų, nusprendė pateikti palankią nuomonę dėl siūlomo dokumento.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad Europos Komisijos planas „REPowerEU“ yra žingsnis teisinga linkme siekiant, kad ES taptų nepriklausoma nuo Rusijos dujų ir naftos tiekimo; pabrėžia, kad daugelio…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualus ir kolektyvinis pasigamintos energijos vartojimas kaip žaliosios ir energetikos pertvarkos ir ekonominės ir socialinės pusiausvyros veiksnys Dokumento esmė EESRK mano, kad vietos ir…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Jūrų transporto teisingumo ir veiksmingumo aspektai Dokumento esmė EESRK pabrėžia, kad vykdant žaliąją pertvarką laivybos sektoriuje būtina atsižvelgti į konkrečioms šalims, konkretiems…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Perėjimas prie ilgalaikės tvarios transporto sistemos DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad piliečiai ir įmonės tik tuo atveju aktyviai rems perėjimą prie ilgalaikės tvarios transporto…