European Economic
and Social Committee
Competitiveness fund
EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Coucil on establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities, repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/522, (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/783, repealing provisions of Regulations (EU) 2021/696, (EU) 2023/588, and amending Regulation (EU) [EDIP], COM(2025) 555 final
Key points
The EESC:
- supports the creation of the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) as a cornerstone of the next EU budget and a driver of innovation, resilience and security, stressing that funding must remain firmly aligned with sustainability and the EU’s social market economy;
- calls for EU-wide, merit-based project selection, with clear criteria such as excellence, future orientation and economic potential. To avoid national gatekeeping, the EESC urges transparent procedures, equal access for applicants in all Member States, and the active involvement of social partners and civil society in governance;
- recommends introducing a “market referendum”, requiring projects seeking major EU top-ups—such as IPCEIs or other large-scale investments—to mobilise a share of private capital first. This market-test mechanism would help validate project quality, reduce politicised funding decisions and strengthen the link between public support and real competitiveness;
- stresses the need for strong risk-assessment and prevention tools, ensuring that ECF resources are channelled only to projects that genuinely enhance Europe’s competitiveness and avoid repeating past shortcomings in EU funding programmes;
- highlights the importance of supporting SMEs, regional and cross-border innovation ecosystems, and investment in skills and decent work, while simplifying procedures and ensuring governance that is transparent, predictable and inclusive.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
-
Record of Proceedings INT/1101
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1101
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: прецени, че съдържанието на предложението е напълно задоволително и не изисква никакви бележки от негова страна, и реши да приеме положително становище по…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ: ЕИСК: счита, че планът REPowerEU на Европейската комисия е стъпка в правилната посока за…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
„Индивидуалното и колективното потребление на собствена енергия като фактор в борбата за екологичен и енергиен преход и за постигането на икономически и социален баланс“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
„Съображения за справедливост и ефективност на морския транспорт“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК: подчертава, че при екологичния преход на сектора на корабоплаването трябва да се вземат предвид…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
TEN/795 — Преходът към дългосрочна устойчива транспортна система ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: счита, че гражданите и предприятията ще подкрепят активно прехода към дългосрочна…