European Economic
and Social Committee
Competitiveness fund
EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Coucil on establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities, repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/522, (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/783, repealing provisions of Regulations (EU) 2021/696, (EU) 2023/588, and amending Regulation (EU) [EDIP], COM(2025) 555 final
Key points
The EESC:
- supports the creation of the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) as a cornerstone of the next EU budget and a driver of innovation, resilience and security, stressing that funding must remain firmly aligned with sustainability and the EU’s social market economy;
- calls for EU-wide, merit-based project selection, with clear criteria such as excellence, future orientation and economic potential. To avoid national gatekeeping, the EESC urges transparent procedures, equal access for applicants in all Member States, and the active involvement of social partners and civil society in governance;
- recommends introducing a “market referendum”, requiring projects seeking major EU top-ups—such as IPCEIs or other large-scale investments—to mobilise a share of private capital first. This market-test mechanism would help validate project quality, reduce politicised funding decisions and strengthen the link between public support and real competitiveness;
- stresses the need for strong risk-assessment and prevention tools, ensuring that ECF resources are channelled only to projects that genuinely enhance Europe’s competitiveness and avoid repeating past shortcomings in EU funding programmes;
- highlights the importance of supporting SMEs, regional and cross-border innovation ecosystems, and investment in skills and decent work, while simplifying procedures and ensuring governance that is transparent, predictable and inclusive.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
-
Record of Proceedings INT/1101
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1101
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK: remdamasis tuo, kad pasiūlymas yra visiškai priimtinas ir kad dėl jo neturi pastabų, nusprendė pateikti palankią nuomonę dėl siūlomo dokumento.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad Europos Komisijos planas „REPowerEU“ yra žingsnis teisinga linkme siekiant, kad ES taptų nepriklausoma nuo Rusijos dujų ir naftos tiekimo; pabrėžia, kad daugelio…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualus ir kolektyvinis pasigamintos energijos vartojimas kaip žaliosios ir energetikos pertvarkos ir ekonominės ir socialinės pusiausvyros veiksnys Dokumento esmė EESRK mano, kad vietos ir…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Jūrų transporto teisingumo ir veiksmingumo aspektai Dokumento esmė EESRK pabrėžia, kad vykdant žaliąją pertvarką laivybos sektoriuje būtina atsižvelgti į konkrečioms šalims, konkretiems…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Perėjimas prie ilgalaikės tvarios transporto sistemos DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad piliečiai ir įmonės tik tuo atveju aktyviai rems perėjimą prie ilgalaikės tvarios transporto…