European Economic
and Social Committee
Competitiveness fund
EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Coucil on establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities, repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/522, (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/783, repealing provisions of Regulations (EU) 2021/696, (EU) 2023/588, and amending Regulation (EU) [EDIP], COM(2025) 555 final
Key points
The EESC:
- supports the creation of the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) as a cornerstone of the next EU budget and a driver of innovation, resilience and security, stressing that funding must remain firmly aligned with sustainability and the EU’s social market economy;
- calls for EU-wide, merit-based project selection, with clear criteria such as excellence, future orientation and economic potential. To avoid national gatekeeping, the EESC urges transparent procedures, equal access for applicants in all Member States, and the active involvement of social partners and civil society in governance;
- recommends introducing a “market referendum”, requiring projects seeking major EU top-ups—such as IPCEIs or other large-scale investments—to mobilise a share of private capital first. This market-test mechanism would help validate project quality, reduce politicised funding decisions and strengthen the link between public support and real competitiveness;
- stresses the need for strong risk-assessment and prevention tools, ensuring that ECF resources are channelled only to projects that genuinely enhance Europe’s competitiveness and avoid repeating past shortcomings in EU funding programmes;
- highlights the importance of supporting SMEs, regional and cross-border innovation ecosystems, and investment in skills and decent work, while simplifying procedures and ensuring governance that is transparent, predictable and inclusive.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
-
Record of Proceedings INT/1101
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1101
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je sklenil ta predlog podpreti.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: meni, da je načrt Evropske komisije REPowerEU korak v pravo smer, da bi EU postala neodvisna od oskrbe z ruskim plinom in nafto; poudarja, da bi se bilo velikemu številu težav…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualna in kolektivna lastna poraba energije kot dejavnik v prizadevanjih za zeleni in energetski prehod ter ekonomsko in socialno ravnovesje Glavne točke EESO: meni, da bi morale lokalne…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Vidiki enakosti in učinkovitosti v pomorskem prometu Glavne točke EESO: poudarja, da je treba pri zelenem prehodu ladijskega prevoza upoštevati značilnosti posameznih držav, sektorjev in…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prehod na dolgoročno trajnostni prometni sistem GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: meni, da bodo državljani in podjetja dejavno podpirali prehod na dolgoročno trajnostni prometni sistem le, če…