European Economic
and Social Committee
Costs of non-immigration (and non-integration) (own-initiative opinion)
The EESC points out that a non-immigration scenario in Europe would mean among other things that Member States' economies would suffer substantially; demographic challenges would be aggravated; pension systems might become unsustainable; racism and xenophobia would flourish even more than at present. Non-integration bears economic, socio-cultural and political risks and costs. Hence, investment in migrant integration is the best insurance policy against potential future costs, problems and tensions.
Key points
The EESC:
- considers that immigration has a positive influence on population and labour force growth. If natural population growth becomes negative, immigration can help keep the total population and labour force constant;
- points out that a non-immigration scenario in Europe would mean among other things that:
- Member States' economies would suffer substantially; job markets would come under possibly irreconcilable strain, whole industries would go bust, agricultural production would drop, construction would not be able to keep up with demand;
- Demographic challenges would be aggravated; pension systems might become unsustainable, the health and care sector could collapse, depopulation of certain areas would proceed at a swift pace;
- Racism and xenophobia would flourish even more than at present;
- highlights, in contrast, the following potential of migration in host countries: job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled, economic growth can be sustained and services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally etc. Countries of origin benefit from remittances, which outstrip foreign aid. Returning migrants bring savings, skills and international contacts;
- stresses that non-integration bears economic, socio-cultural and political risks and costs. Hence, investment in migrant integration is the best insurance policy against potential future costs, problems and tensions;
- underlines that promoting integration is key to reinforcing EU fundamental values and principles, of which diversity, equality and non-discrimination are crucial ones. It is imperative that EU Member States learn from one another and honestly strive to foster an environment in which migrant integration is achievable and the risks are avoided.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Eftersom kommittén stöder förslaget, som inte föranleder några särskilda kommentarer, beslutade EESK att avge ett positivt yttrande om förslaget.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommittén (EESK) menar att REPowerEU-planen är ett steg i rätt riktning för att göra EU oberoende av försörjning av gas och olja…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuell och kollektiv egenförbrukning av energi som en faktor i kampen för den gröna omställningen och energiomställningen och för ekonomisk och social balans Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rättvise- och effektivitetshänsyn avseende sjötransport Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommitténs (EESK) ståndpunkt: Den gröna omställningen inom sjöfartssektorn måste ta hänsyn…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omställningen till ett långsiktigt hållbart transportsystem HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Medborgare och företag kommer att aktivt stödja omställningen till ett långsiktigt…