European Economic
and Social Committee
Costs of non-immigration (and non-integration) (own-initiative opinion)
The EESC points out that a non-immigration scenario in Europe would mean among other things that Member States' economies would suffer substantially; demographic challenges would be aggravated; pension systems might become unsustainable; racism and xenophobia would flourish even more than at present. Non-integration bears economic, socio-cultural and political risks and costs. Hence, investment in migrant integration is the best insurance policy against potential future costs, problems and tensions.
Key points
The EESC:
- considers that immigration has a positive influence on population and labour force growth. If natural population growth becomes negative, immigration can help keep the total population and labour force constant;
- points out that a non-immigration scenario in Europe would mean among other things that:
- Member States' economies would suffer substantially; job markets would come under possibly irreconcilable strain, whole industries would go bust, agricultural production would drop, construction would not be able to keep up with demand;
- Demographic challenges would be aggravated; pension systems might become unsustainable, the health and care sector could collapse, depopulation of certain areas would proceed at a swift pace;
- Racism and xenophobia would flourish even more than at present;
- highlights, in contrast, the following potential of migration in host countries: job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled, economic growth can be sustained and services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally etc. Countries of origin benefit from remittances, which outstrip foreign aid. Returning migrants bring savings, skills and international contacts;
- stresses that non-integration bears economic, socio-cultural and political risks and costs. Hence, investment in migrant integration is the best insurance policy against potential future costs, problems and tensions;
- underlines that promoting integration is key to reinforcing EU fundamental values and principles, of which diversity, equality and non-discrimination are crucial ones. It is imperative that EU Member States learn from one another and honestly strive to foster an environment in which migrant integration is achievable and the risks are avoided.
Downloads
Recommended for you
The cost of non-Europe - the benefits of the single market
Opinion
EESC opinion on the 2022 Strategic Foresight Report - COM(2022) 289 final Key points The EESC: believes that the single market is about improving welfare through social and…
Fragmentation of supply chains and impact on the cost of living
Opinion
The language versions will be available for download as the translations are completed.Key PointsThe EESC:emphasises the necessity for the EU to reduce import dependencies, especially for critical…
The cost of non-Schengen for the Single market – impact on Bulgaria and Romania
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:calls the Council to set a date for lifting land border controls between Bulgaria and Romania and the other Schengen Member States as early as 2024. The EESC calls on all…
How single market dysfunctionalities contribute to the rising cost of living
Opinion
KeypointsThe EESC : finds it regrettable that the cost of living in Europe is being fuelled by persisting dysfunctionalities in the European Single Market, and believes that more decisive action…
The future of EU industry in the face of high energy prices and transition costs
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:calls for urgent action to establish a comprehensive EU industrial strategy that ensures competitive industries and quality jobs, aligning with Green Deal objectives through close…