European Economic
and Social Committee
Sharing economy and self-regulation (exploratory opinion requested by the Dutch presidency)
Key points
The Opinion presents a list of characteristics which make it possible to define the sharing economy model and to distinguish between genuine practices that require special arrangements and those that are sometimes wrongly described as such merely to get around regulations that should apply to them.
The social and environmental dimensions of the sharing economy have the potential to strengthen solidarity between people, boost local economies, create jobs, rationalise household consumption by pooling the use of certain goods, reduce energy footprints and promote more responsible and sustainable consumption.
The Commission should undertake policy measures in order to ensure that the numerous varieties of the sharing economy and the different ways it operates are supported, implemented, and gain credibility and trust at EU level and in the various Member States.
New business models need to comply with the applicable national and EU legislation.
The rights of all partners operating in the sharing economy, including prosumers, must be protected by adapting these relations across the existing EU acquis on consumer rights.
The EU must urgently define a clear and transparent legal framework within which these activities should be developed and implemented in the European area.
The Commission should publish without further delay the long overdue "European agenda for the collaborative economy" in order to provide a clear definition of the complementary role that self- and co-regulation must play in the sharing economy.
Other relevant EESC opinions on sharing economy:
- Collaborative or participatory consumption: a sustainable model for the 21st century (INT/686 - CESE 2788/2013)
- Building a sustainable economy by transforming our model of consumption (INT/497 - CESE 959/2010)
- Circular economy (NAT/651 - CESE 5002/2014)
- The circular economy: job creation and the Green Action Plan for SMEs (NAT/652 - CESE 5003/2014)
- Economy for the Common Good (ECO/378 - CESE 2060/2015)
Other relevant EESC opinions on self-regulation:
- Better Regulation (SC/41 - CESE 3697/2015)
- Self-regulation and co-regulation (INT/754 - CESE 4850/2014)
- Programme REFIT (INT/750 - CESE 4458/2014)
- Better regulation: implementing acts and delegated acts (INT/656 - CESE 248/2013)
- The Single Market Act - identifying missing measures (INT/688 - CESE 3154/2013)
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Eftersom kommittén stöder förslaget, som inte föranleder några särskilda kommentarer, beslutade EESK att avge ett positivt yttrande om förslaget.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommittén (EESK) menar att REPowerEU-planen är ett steg i rätt riktning för att göra EU oberoende av försörjning av gas och olja…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuell och kollektiv egenförbrukning av energi som en faktor i kampen för den gröna omställningen och energiomställningen och för ekonomisk och social balans Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rättvise- och effektivitetshänsyn avseende sjötransport Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommitténs (EESK) ståndpunkt: Den gröna omställningen inom sjöfartssektorn måste ta hänsyn…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omställningen till ett långsiktigt hållbart transportsystem HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Medborgare och företag kommer att aktivt stödja omställningen till ett långsiktigt…