Sharing economy and self-regulation (exploratory opinion requested by the Dutch presidency)

Key points

The Opinion presents a list of characteristics which make it possible to define the sharing economy model and to distinguish between genuine practices that require special arrangements and those that are sometimes wrongly described as such merely to get around regulations that should apply to them.

The social and environmental dimensions of the sharing economy have the potential to strengthen solidarity between people, boost local economies, create jobs, rationalise household consumption by pooling the use of certain goods, reduce energy footprints and promote more responsible and sustainable consumption.

The Commission should undertake policy measures in order to ensure that the numerous varieties of the sharing economy and the different ways it operates are supported, implemented, and gain credibility and trust at EU level and in the various Member States.

New business models need to comply with the applicable national and EU legislation.

The rights of all partners operating in the sharing economy, including prosumers, must be protected by adapting these relations across the existing EU acquis on consumer rights.

The EU must urgently define a clear and transparent legal framework within which these activities should be developed and implemented in the European area.

The Commission should publish without further delay the long overdue "European agenda for the collaborative economy" in order to provide a clear definition of the complementary role that self- and co-regulation must play in the sharing economy.

 

Other relevant EESC opinions on sharing economy:

 

Other relevant EESC opinions on self-regulation:

 

For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.

Downloads

Download — Становище на ЕИСК: Sharing economy and self-regulation (exploratory opinion requested by the Dutch presidency)

Recommended for you

  • Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC

    Opinion

    ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ     ЕИСК: прецени, че съдържанието на предложението е напълно задоволително и не изисква никакви бележки от негова страна, и реши да приеме положително становище по…

  • RePowerEU Plan

    Opinion

    PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ  ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ: ЕИСК: счита, че планът REPowerEU на Европейската комисия е стъпка в правилната посока за…

  • Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance

    Opinion

    „Индивидуалното и колективното потребление на собствена енергия като фактор в борбата за екологичен и енергиен преход и за постигането на икономически и социален баланс“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК:…

  • Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation

    Opinion

    „Съображения за справедливост и ефективност на морския транспорт“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК: подчертава, че при екологичния преход на сектора на корабоплаването трябва да се вземат предвид…

  • The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system

    Opinion

    TEN/795 — Преходът към дългосрочна устойчива транспортна система   ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ   ЕИСК:   счита, че гражданите и предприятията ще подкрепят активно прехода към дългосрочна…