European Economic
and Social Committee
AgoraEU and Justice programmes
Key points
The EESC:
welcomes the Commission’s proposals for the AgoraEU and Justice programmes, and urges the European Parliament and Council to endorse the proposals without reducing the proposed financial envelope;
calls for explicit recognition of advocacy as a core part of civil society organisations’ (CSOs) work and their role in policymaking to strengthen democracy and resilience;
recommends introducing operating grants across all AgoraEU strands to reinforce CSOs’ institutional stability, and it requests extending operating grants under the Justice programme to non-profit organisations of general European interest;
supports maintaining financial support to third parties (FSTP) via intermediary organisations to reach smaller or grassroots groups, and calls for ensuring the independence of intermediaries and the compliance of their governance with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as key eligibility criteria in their selection. The EESC also requests clarity on co-financing rates, proposing up to 100% EU funding for intermediaries and final beneficiaries implementing delegated activities;
notes the need to adapt the Creative Europe Desks’ mandate and resources to effectively support AgoraEU’s broader scope across cultural, media, and civic sectors;
calls for flexibility and safeguards (e.g. indexation, corrective mechanisms) in lump-sum and multiannual grants to prevent financial strain on beneficiaries;
seeks clarity on synergies between the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) and the Media+ strand of AgoraEU; and it urges the Commission to connect grant recipients and develop an action plan to operationalise combined and cumulative funding under both Regulations, including joint calls, DG cooperation, and performance monitoring;
recommends strengthening the focus on victims’ rights and access to justice in the Justice programme, including funding for support networks, practitioner training, and cross-border legal aid;
calls for addressing intra-EU funding disparities, particularly the East–West divide, in both programmes;
regrets the removal of the Civil Dialogue Working Group from the AgoraEU Regulation and urges its reinstatement;
emphasises that programme impact depends on adequate national infrastructure and co-funding, and proposes linking access to EU shared management funds to Member States’ demonstrated support for AgoraEU and Justice objectives.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Eftersom kommittén stöder förslaget, som inte föranleder några särskilda kommentarer, beslutade EESK att avge ett positivt yttrande om förslaget.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommittén (EESK) menar att REPowerEU-planen är ett steg i rätt riktning för att göra EU oberoende av försörjning av gas och olja…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuell och kollektiv egenförbrukning av energi som en faktor i kampen för den gröna omställningen och energiomställningen och för ekonomisk och social balans Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rättvise- och effektivitetshänsyn avseende sjötransport Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommitténs (EESK) ståndpunkt: Den gröna omställningen inom sjöfartssektorn måste ta hänsyn…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omställningen till ett långsiktigt hållbart transportsystem HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Medborgare och företag kommer att aktivt stödja omställningen till ett långsiktigt…