Chudoba

This page is also available in:

  • Prijaté on 25/01/2017 - Bureau decision date: 15/03/2016
    Referenčné dokumenty
    SOC/542-EESC-2016-01902-00-04-ac

    The EESC adopted this opinion after in-depth work carried out during the four meetings of the study group. The opinion also reflects the national debates with civil society organisations carried out in all Member States between 2 September and 2 November 2016. These discussions were coordinated by three members of the EESC ('trios') from the country concerned, often in cooperation with the European Commission (15 debates) or the national economic and social council (7 debates). Participants came from a wide range of employers' and trade union organisations and other civil society organisations, as well as, to a lesser extent, from the academic world. A total of 116 EESC members and nearly 1,800 representatives of civil society organisations participated in the 28 debates. The conclusions/recommendations of the national debates have been grouped in the opinion, while the reports on the national debates will be published separately.

    • Relevant Eurofound publications, non-exhaustive chronological list
    Download — Stanovisko EHSV: European Pillar of Social Rights
  • Prijaté on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 17/02/2016
    Referenčné dokumenty
    SOC/537-EESC-2016-00747-00-01-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Poland

    The EESC advocates the creation of an integrated European fund to combat poverty and social exclusion, based on the experiences of the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) and the European Social Fund (ESF). The current use of the ESF and the FEAD in the Member States should be monitored more effectively and the process should involve civil society organisations. Member States should make greater use of global grants and regranting, and treat in-kind contributions on an equal footing with financial contributions. A greater share of the resources allocated to operational programmes should be earmarked for projects with smaller budgets. The EESC is ready to develop – in cooperation with CSOs – a consultation platform to ensure better coordination of ESF and FEAD interventions and to enable discussion on the basic principles of a future integrated EU fund.

    Download — Stanovisko EHSV: The effectiveness of ESF and FEAD funding as part of civil society efforts to tackle poverty and social exclusion under the Europe 2020 strategy (own-initiative opinion)
  • Prijaté on 17/02/2016 - Bureau decision date: 08/12/2015
    Referenčné dokumenty
    SOC/530-EESC-2015-06663-00-03-ac
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Ireland
    Workers - GR II
    Netherlands

    The EESC supports the intention of the Dutch Presidency of the Council to address poverty through integrated approaches and through cooperation between public and private stakeholders. However, to do so, Member States must be supported by a common European framework and best-practice actors by national anti-poverty strategies. The EU Council should reiterate the commitment made to meet Europe's poverty target by 2020.

    Download — Stanovisko EHSV: Fighting poverty (exploratory opinion requested by the Dutch presidency)
  • Prijaté on 14/02/2013
    Referenčné dokumenty
    SOC/473-EESC-2012-2450
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Poland
    Plenary session number
    487
    -
    Download — EESC opinion: Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived