European Economic
and Social Committee
Ex-post evaluations of the Rural Development Programmes 2007/2013
Background
In conjunction with interinstitutional cooperation, the "Better law-making" agreement and the REFIT programme, the Committee is taking part in the evaluation of EU policies and legislation. This evaluation entails drawing up an inventory of the assessments, criticisms, concerns and requests of the organisations represented in the Committee and, where appropriate, of other civil society organisations, to be forwarded to the institutions assisted by the Committee under Article 300(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Further to the EESC Bureau decision of 20 September 2016 on the EESC's participation in the evaluation of EU policies and legislation, it has been decided to prepare an information report on the ex post evaluation of rural development programmes 2007-2013. This report will be limited to one or two pages of conclusions and an appendix setting out a technical report. In its conclusions, the Committee will highlight the main ways in which the policy in question has affected civil society and, if appropriate, will recommend that an opinion be adopted at a later date, possibly providing suggestions for its content. The appendix will include an inventory of consultation activities carried out and the findings thereof.
Summary of the Information Report
The EESC has found the rural development policy to be one of the most welcome EU policies. RDPs boosted regional development, stimulated economic growth and job creation and succeeded to transform the situation of the countryside across the EU.
A lack of coordination, complementariness and consistency with the actions of the other structural and cohesion funds (Social Fund, Regional Development Fund, etc.) in rural areas hindered the overall aim of a more balanced territorial development. Future RDPs should focus on vulnerable EU areas in order to achieve a better balance between rural and urban areas.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HLAVNÉ BODY EHSV: usúdil, že návrh je uspokojivý a nie sú k nemu potrebné žiadne pripomienky, rozhodol sa zaujať k predkladanému textu kladné stanovisko.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HLAVNÉ BODY EHSV: sa domnieva, že plán Európskej komisie REPowerEU je krokom správnym smerom k tomu, aby sa EÚ stala nezávislá od ruských dodávok plynu a ropy, poukazuje na to, že…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuálna a kolektívna vlastná spotreba energie ako faktor v boji za zelenú a energetickú transformáciu a hospodársku a sociálnu rovnováhu Hlavné body EHSV: sa domnieva, že miestne a…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Zohľadňovanie spravodlivosti a efektívnosti v námornej deprave Hlavné body EHSV: zdôrazňuje, že zelená transformácia odvetvia lodnej dopravy musí zohľadňovať charakteristiky špecifické pre…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prechod na dlhodobo udržateľný dopravný systém HLAVNÉ BODY EHSV: sa domnieva, že občania a podniky budú aktívne podporovať prechod na dlhodobo udržateľný dopravný systém len…