Betere regelgeving

This page is also available in

Displaying 1 - 10 of 53

Pages

Goedgekeurd on 21/01/2017
Referentie: 
INT/817-EESC-2017-01443-00-00-ac-tra
Zitting: 
528 -
Sep 20, 2017 Sep 21, 2017

Impact assessments of any legislative proposals must be integrated and accorded due importance to the economic, social and environmental dimensions, including for SMEs. The Committee has called for the Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to agree on a common methodology on impact assessments and evaluations, which could also serve as a prompt for the Committee. It is extremely concerned by the findings on the shortcomings of social and environmental impact assessments and the follow-up to consultations. It calls on the Commission to be more transparent and to give fully documented reasons why a particular measure or proposal is or is not to be submitted for impact assessment and/or an ex-post analysis.

advies EESC: Transparency, methodology and resources of evaluations

Goedgekeurd on 18/10/2017
Referentie: 
/-EESC-2017-04279-00-00-AC-TRA
Zitting: 
529 -
Oct 18, 2017 Oct 19, 2017

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has requested the Committee's views on whether the steps taken by the European Commission to enforce EU law have addressed European's concerns. The ECA would like to know which specific aspects of the monitoring of the application of the legislation in particular have caught the EESC's attention.

advies EESC: Monitoring the application of EU legislation

Goedgekeurd on 19/04/2018
Referentie: 
INT/838-EESC-2017-06085-00-00-AC-TRA
Zitting: 
534 -
Apr 18, 2018 Apr 19, 2018

The EESC is of the view that the Better Regulation Agenda should become a permanent programme in delivering high-quality Union legislation without undermining key policy objectives or creating deregulation pressure.

advies EESC: Better Regulation/state of play

Goedgekeurd on 09/12/2015
Referentie: 
ECO/383-EESC-2015-02961-00-01-ac-tra
Zitting: 
512 -
Dec 09, 2015 Dec 10, 2015

The EESC expresses its support for the Commission in combating the erosion of Member States' tax bases and unfair tax competition. The Committee in this context endorses the introduction of a CCCTB and is also pleased that the Commission has published a list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The EESC goes even further and proposes that EU rules should include sanctions for companies that continue to run their business through tax havens.

advies EESC: Action Plan on Fairer Corporate Taxation

Downloads: 

Slideshow DG TAXUD – A Fair and Efficient Corporate Taxation

Goedgekeurd on 19/09/2018
Referentie: 
INT/853-EESC-2018-02126-00-00-AC-TRA

The EESC agrees with the European Commission about the need to modernise and simplify EU consumer policy and considers that the new legislative package contributes to bridging the gap created by the exponential growth of e-commerce, undermining consumer confidence and causing distortions to the single market.

advies EESC: A New Deal for Consumers

Pages