You are here

Legislar melhor

Displaying 1 - 10 of 59

Pages

Adotados on 21/01/2017
Referência: 
INT/817-EESC-2017-01443-00-00-ac-tra
Reunião plenária: 
528 -
Sep 20, 2017 Sep 21, 2017

Impact assessments of any legislative proposals must be integrated and accorded due importance to the economic, social and environmental dimensions, including for SMEs. The Committee has called for the Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to agree on a common methodology on impact assessments and evaluations, which could also serve as a prompt for the Committee. It is extremely concerned by the findings on the shortcomings of social and environmental impact assessments and the follow-up to consultations. It calls on the Commission to be more transparent and to give fully documented reasons why a particular measure or proposal is or is not to be submitted for impact assessment and/or an ex-post analysis.

EESC opinion: Transparency, methodology and resources of evaluations

Adotados on 18/10/2017
Referência: 
/-EESC-2017-04279-00-00-AC-TRA
Reunião plenária: 
529 -
Oct 18, 2017 Oct 19, 2017

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has requested the Committee's views on whether the steps taken by the European Commission to enforce EU law have addressed European's concerns. The ECA would like to know which specific aspects of the monitoring of the application of the legislation in particular have caught the EESC's attention.

EESC opinion: Monitoring the application of EU legislation

Adotados on 19/04/2018
Referência: 
INT/838-EESC-2017-06085-00-00-AC-TRA
Reunião plenária: 
534 -
Apr 18, 2018 Apr 19, 2018

The EESC is of the view that the Better Regulation Agenda should become a permanent programme in delivering high-quality Union legislation without undermining key policy objectives or creating deregulation pressure.

EESC opinion: Better Regulation/state of play

Pages