European Economic
and Social Committee
Revision of the product liability directive
Key points
The EESC:
- recognises the relevance of the civil liability regime set out in the Commission's proposal, which offers Europeans the means to obtain compensation for damage suffered as a result of a product defect;
- notes that by definition, a no-fault liability regime aims to restore the balance between the rights of manufacturers and those of potential victims; calls on the co-legislators and national authorities to maintain the balance achieved in this proposal when adopting and transposing it;
- therefore supports the need to ensure legal certainty for all: for the complainant by providing access to a simplified legal framework for obtaining compensation, and for the manufacturer, who can continue to innovate, all the while being aware of their liabilities and budgeting for their risks;
- recognises that the revision of the Directive in question addresses numerous consumer demands, such as the identification of those liable, access to information and compensation, and extended coverage to cover digital and psychological damage;
- acknowledges the need to adapt the regime to digital challenges and supports the measures put forward in the proposal to address them. The Committee also stresses the need to remain technologically neutral in managing product liability;
- calls for the proposal to be aligned with the acquis communautaire regarding the definitions and hierarchy of liability, and also simplified, in line with the laws currently being adopted;
- also calls for greater consistency in the wording of identical obligations, which have been described in different ways in different legal texts. The EESC recommends that measures be simplified rather than duplicated, in particular by referring to or extending existing obligations.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: прецени, че съдържанието на предложението е напълно задоволително и не изисква никакви бележки от негова страна, и реши да приеме положително становище по…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ: ЕИСК: счита, че планът REPowerEU на Европейската комисия е стъпка в правилната посока за…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
„Индивидуалното и колективното потребление на собствена енергия като фактор в борбата за екологичен и енергиен преход и за постигането на икономически и социален баланс“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
„Съображения за справедливост и ефективност на морския транспорт“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК: подчертава, че при екологичния преход на сектора на корабоплаването трябва да се вземат предвид…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
TEN/795 — Преходът към дългосрочна устойчива транспортна система ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: счита, че гражданите и предприятията ще подкрепят активно прехода към дългосрочна…