Revision of the product liability directive

Key points

The EESC:

  • recognises the relevance of the civil liability regime set out in the Commission's proposal, which offers Europeans the means to obtain compensation for damage suffered as a result of a product defect;
  • notes that by definition, a no-fault liability regime aims to restore the balance between the rights of manufacturers and those of potential victims; calls on the co-legislators and national authorities to maintain the balance achieved in this proposal when adopting and transposing it;
  • therefore supports the need to ensure legal certainty for all: for the complainant by providing access to a simplified legal framework for obtaining compensation, and for the manufacturer, who can continue to innovate, all the while being aware of their liabilities and budgeting for their risks;
  • recognises that the revision of the Directive in question addresses numerous consumer demands, such as the identification of those liable, access to information and compensation, and extended coverage to cover digital and psychological damage;
  • acknowledges the need to adapt the regime to digital challenges and supports the measures put forward in the proposal to address them. The Committee also stresses the need to remain technologically neutral in managing product liability;
  • calls for the proposal to be aligned with the acquis communautaire regarding the definitions and hierarchy of liability, and also simplified, in line with the laws currently being adopted;
  • also calls for greater consistency in the wording of identical obligations, which have been described in different ways in different legal texts. The EESC recommends that measures be simplified rather than duplicated, in particular by referring to or extending existing obligations.

For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.

Downloads

Download — EESC opinion: Revision of the product liability directive

Recommended for you

  • Artificial intelligence liability directive

    Opinion

    EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence - Artificial…

  • Revision of the Design Directive and Regulation

    Opinion

    Key points The EESC: Endorses the new definition of a design set out in the proposal for a directive. Supports limiting protection to those features of appearance, which are shown visibly in the…

  • Revision of the toy safety directive

    Opinion

    Key points: The EESC: supports the Commission's initiative and considers it reasonable, necessary and proportionate overall, given that children's safety cannot be compromised; considers that the…

  • Revision of the tobacco taxation Directive

    Opinion

    Key pointsThe EESC:supports the revision of the Tobacco Taxation Directive, recognising the need to adapt the excise framework to market developments, new products and public health objectives, while…

  • Revision of the late payments Directive

    Opinion

    EESC Opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating late payment in commercial transactions, [COM(2023) 533 final - 2023/0323 (COD)…