European Economic
and Social Committee
Revision of the product liability directive
Key points
The EESC:
- recognises the relevance of the civil liability regime set out in the Commission's proposal, which offers Europeans the means to obtain compensation for damage suffered as a result of a product defect;
- notes that by definition, a no-fault liability regime aims to restore the balance between the rights of manufacturers and those of potential victims; calls on the co-legislators and national authorities to maintain the balance achieved in this proposal when adopting and transposing it;
- therefore supports the need to ensure legal certainty for all: for the complainant by providing access to a simplified legal framework for obtaining compensation, and for the manufacturer, who can continue to innovate, all the while being aware of their liabilities and budgeting for their risks;
- recognises that the revision of the Directive in question addresses numerous consumer demands, such as the identification of those liable, access to information and compensation, and extended coverage to cover digital and psychological damage;
- acknowledges the need to adapt the regime to digital challenges and supports the measures put forward in the proposal to address them. The Committee also stresses the need to remain technologically neutral in managing product liability;
- calls for the proposal to be aligned with the acquis communautaire regarding the definitions and hierarchy of liability, and also simplified, in line with the laws currently being adopted;
- also calls for greater consistency in the wording of identical obligations, which have been described in different ways in different legal texts. The EESC recommends that measures be simplified rather than duplicated, in particular by referring to or extending existing obligations.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…