European Economic
and Social Committee
AI, Big Data and rare diseases
Key points
The EESC:
welcomes AI’s potential to improve rare disease patient pathways, personalised medicines, and overall quality of life, while acknowledging concerns about data privacy, bias, affordability and accessibility;
encourages all Member States to digitise health data promptly and adopt ORPHA codes to improve cross-border data sharing and support the European Health Data Space;
recommends that AI healthcare models access only anonymised and encrypted patient data, and any misuse should be subject to strict sanctions. Clear patient consent frameworks and independent monitoring bodies are key to ensure transparency and accountability;
calls for the European Medicines Agency to require explainability in AI-driven healthcare decisions and ensure physician oversight for all medical recommendations;
stresses the need for developing professional training programs on AI diagnostic tools, to ensure human oversight. EU-wide campaigns should raise AI literacy among patients and healthcare professionals;
recommends that AI models be trained on diverse, gender-balanced datasets to prevent discrimination, with the EU AI Office promoting bias audits and gender-focused pre-market testing. Targeted funding should support women in AI and medical data science;
calls for the EIT to expand mentorship and leadership programs to boost female participation in AI healthcare, and for Horizon Europe to fund gender-focused AI research to develop better diagnostics for conditions disproportionately affecting women and underrepresented groups;
highlights that data governance must give patients control over their information, including the right to withdraw consent and understand its use, and encourages patient-led registries and data cooperatives;
recommends that Horizon Europe fund start-ups and SMEs developing AI for rare disease diagnostics to avoid dominance by large corporations. Public-private partnerships should ensure AI tools are affordable, accessible, and that data access remains fair;
welcomes AI-driven personalised medicines and rare disease treatments, but points out the need for sustainable pricing mechanisms. Recommends a publicly funded EU AI diagnostic platform and cross-border AI data sharing to benefit smaller hospitals and research institutions;
calls for EU-wide ethical guidelines for AI in healthcare to ensure equal access, patient safety, and responsible innovation.
Downloads
-
Follow-up from the Commission SOC/834
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
GŁÓWNE PUNKTY EKES: Uznawszy, że treść wniosku jest zadowalająca i nie wymaga żadnego komentarza z jego strony, postanowił wydać pozytywną opinię na temat proponowanego tekstu.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
GŁÓWNE PUNKTY: EKES: uważa, że plan REPowerEU Komisji Europejskiej jest krokiem we właściwym kierunku, aby uniezależnić UE od dostaw gazu i ropy naftowej z Rosji; zwraca uwagę, że wielu…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Indywidualna i zbiorowa konsumpcja własna energii jako czynnik w walce o transformację ekologiczną i energetyczną oraz o równowagę gospodarczą i społeczną Główne punkty EKES Uważa, że władze…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Kwestie sprawiedliwości i efektywności w transporcie morskim Główne punkty EKES Podkreśla, że ekologiczna transformacja sektora żeglugi musi uwzględniać specyfikę poszczególnych krajów, sektorów…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Przejście na długoterminowy, zrównoważony system transportowy GŁÓWNE PUNKTY EKES: Uważa, że obywatele i przedsiębiorstwa będą aktywnie wspierać przejście na długoterminowy,…