European Economic
and Social Committee
Revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) and of the Regulation on the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR)
Key points
The EESC:
- Agrees that the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) is a consistent policy approach to protect ecosystems and human health as it covers all relevant potential pollution from agro-industrial installations in a well-integrated manner on a sector-by-sector basis.
- Affirms that the opinion is technical and integrates two Commission proposals, but is of great importance because it takes into account all stakeholders.
- Underlines that the revision of the IED aims to stimulate a profound industry transformation to realise a clean environment that improves public health and supports the zero pollution ambition under the European Green Deal.
- Notes that the Industrial Emissions Directive has not been consistently integrated in all member states, which undermines its objectives.
- Agrees with the European Court of Auditors that the polluter pays principle should be given a clear meaning. Besides the monetised economic costs vs. societal benefits ratios, for the sake of transparency and completeness, societal costs vs. societal and environmental benefits indicators should also be analysed.
- Underlines the ambitions set out in the European Green Deal to take new measures to address pollutions from large agro-industrial installations, by updating the EU rules on industrial emissions of EU's main instrument regulating pollutant emissions from industrial installations, and to contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals.
- Suggests providing more clarification on the impact of the IED on different industries, as different realities need to be taken into account, i.e. the implementation of the IED on the different farming industries.
- Welcomes the establishment of the Industrial Emissions Portal to empower EU citizens with environmental data that allows them to make informed participation in environmental decision-making on the EU's largest (agro-)industrial activities.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
De transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de lange termijn HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: meent dat burgers en bedrijven de transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de…