European Economic
and Social Committee
Revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) and of the Regulation on the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR)
Key points
The EESC:
- Agrees that the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) is a consistent policy approach to protect ecosystems and human health as it covers all relevant potential pollution from agro-industrial installations in a well-integrated manner on a sector-by-sector basis.
- Affirms that the opinion is technical and integrates two Commission proposals, but is of great importance because it takes into account all stakeholders.
- Underlines that the revision of the IED aims to stimulate a profound industry transformation to realise a clean environment that improves public health and supports the zero pollution ambition under the European Green Deal.
- Notes that the Industrial Emissions Directive has not been consistently integrated in all member states, which undermines its objectives.
- Agrees with the European Court of Auditors that the polluter pays principle should be given a clear meaning. Besides the monetised economic costs vs. societal benefits ratios, for the sake of transparency and completeness, societal costs vs. societal and environmental benefits indicators should also be analysed.
- Underlines the ambitions set out in the European Green Deal to take new measures to address pollutions from large agro-industrial installations, by updating the EU rules on industrial emissions of EU's main instrument regulating pollutant emissions from industrial installations, and to contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals.
- Suggests providing more clarification on the impact of the IED on different industries, as different realities need to be taken into account, i.e. the implementation of the IED on the different farming industries.
- Welcomes the establishment of the Industrial Emissions Portal to empower EU citizens with environmental data that allows them to make informed participation in environmental decision-making on the EU's largest (agro-)industrial activities.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je sklenil ta predlog podpreti.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: meni, da je načrt Evropske komisije REPowerEU korak v pravo smer, da bi EU postala neodvisna od oskrbe z ruskim plinom in nafto; poudarja, da bi se bilo velikemu številu težav…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualna in kolektivna lastna poraba energije kot dejavnik v prizadevanjih za zeleni in energetski prehod ter ekonomsko in socialno ravnovesje Glavne točke EESO: meni, da bi morale lokalne…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Vidiki enakosti in učinkovitosti v pomorskem prometu Glavne točke EESO: poudarja, da je treba pri zelenem prehodu ladijskega prevoza upoštevati značilnosti posameznih držav, sektorjev in…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prehod na dolgoročno trajnostni prometni sistem GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: meni, da bodo državljani in podjetja dejavno podpirali prehod na dolgoročno trajnostni prometni sistem le, če…