European Economic
and Social Committee
Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund
Key points:
The EESC
- reaffirms its strong commitment to and belief in cohesion policy and considers it a major instrument for bringing the EU closer to its citizens and for tackling disparities among EU regions and inequalities among citizens;
- completely disagrees with the cuts to the cohesion policy in general, and in particular cuts of 12% to the ERDF and 46% to the Cohesion Fund (CF);
- underlines that the decrease in the national co-financing rates will hinder the implementation of projects, especially by Member States facing budget difficulties;
- calls upon the Commission to make the criteria for co-financing more flexible;
- considers that the Commission's proposal to reintroduce the N+2 rule is not supported by practical evidence or by the results analysis of the implementation of the N+3 rule;
- welcomes the Commission's proposal for the simplification of the use of the funds;
- welcomes the fact that the Commission proposal improves multi-level governance with its emphasis on shared management, enhancing the participation of civil society organisations;
- strongly recommends that the Commission establish a European Civil Society Cohesion Forum;
- proposes that sparsely populated areas, isolated areas, small islands and mountainous regions, in accordance with Article 174 of the TFEU, be supported with the same thematic concentration requirements;
- recommends that the European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) budget be increased for the new programming period;
- asks the Commission to take other social indicators into account;
- regrets that the Commission proposals for all regulations have excluded the horizontal incorporation of equality, non-discrimination and accessibility for persons with disabilities;
- underlines that the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) should be fully embedded in the main text of the proposed regulations as well as in the CPR regulation;
- considers that the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) needs to be prioritised in cohesion policy. It therefore firmly recommends that a minimum of 10% be allocated to PO 4 of the ERDF, establishing the Social Sustainability and Accessibility Regional Initiative (SSARI).
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
Open Dag van de Europese instellingen
Event
Op zaterdag 6 mei kon het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité (EESC) samen met de andere EU-instellingen in Brussel voor het eerst sinds de COVID-19-crisis zijn deuren weer openen ter gelegenheid…