European Economic
and Social Committee
Regulation on the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund
Key points:
The EESC
- reaffirms its strong commitment to and belief in cohesion policy and considers it a major instrument for bringing the EU closer to its citizens and for tackling disparities among EU regions and inequalities among citizens;
- completely disagrees with the cuts to the cohesion policy in general, and in particular cuts of 12% to the ERDF and 46% to the Cohesion Fund (CF);
- underlines that the decrease in the national co-financing rates will hinder the implementation of projects, especially by Member States facing budget difficulties;
- calls upon the Commission to make the criteria for co-financing more flexible;
- considers that the Commission's proposal to reintroduce the N+2 rule is not supported by practical evidence or by the results analysis of the implementation of the N+3 rule;
- welcomes the Commission's proposal for the simplification of the use of the funds;
- welcomes the fact that the Commission proposal improves multi-level governance with its emphasis on shared management, enhancing the participation of civil society organisations;
- strongly recommends that the Commission establish a European Civil Society Cohesion Forum;
- proposes that sparsely populated areas, isolated areas, small islands and mountainous regions, in accordance with Article 174 of the TFEU, be supported with the same thematic concentration requirements;
- recommends that the European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) budget be increased for the new programming period;
- asks the Commission to take other social indicators into account;
- regrets that the Commission proposals for all regulations have excluded the horizontal incorporation of equality, non-discrimination and accessibility for persons with disabilities;
- underlines that the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) should be fully embedded in the main text of the proposed regulations as well as in the CPR regulation;
- considers that the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) needs to be prioritised in cohesion policy. It therefore firmly recommends that a minimum of 10% be allocated to PO 4 of the ERDF, establishing the Social Sustainability and Accessibility Regional Initiative (SSARI).
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTOS CLAVE El CESE: Considerando que el contenido de la propuesta es satisfactorio y no es objeto de ninguna observación por su parte, decidió emitir un dictamen favorable sobre la propuesta.
La UE necesita más inversión pública en infraestructuras energéticas para luchar contra el cambio climático
News
En un Dictamen aprobado en el pleno de septiembre, el Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) afirma que se necesita una inversión pública masiva para lograr la transición energética y cumplir los…
Energía: el CESE advierte contra la creación de nuevas dependencias
News
El Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) se pronuncia con firmeza sobre la energía en un Dictamen aprobado en su pleno de septiembre: la propuesta de la Comisión es un paso en la dirección…
La transición digital debe ser justa: los derechos humanos y el control humano deben seguir teniendo una importancia fundamental
News
El Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) señala las oportunidades que presenta la revolución digital, pero también advierte de sus peligros: si se implantan con demasiada rapidez, las soluciones…
La UE necesita ya un plan de acción para ofrecer una vivienda asequible y digna
News
En la conferencia de alto nivel que el Comité Económico y Social Europeo (CESE) celebró en Riga los participantes dieron la voz de alarma por la crisis de la vivienda asequible y advirtieron que ya…