European Economic
and Social Committee
Consolidating the EU Civil Protection Mechanism in order to improve the EU's capacity to react in the face of extreme events, including those occurring outside its territory
Key points:
The Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM or 'the Mechanism') is no longer sufficiently capable nor wide enough to respond to disasters linked to climate change and multiple risks in terms of prevention, preparedness, warning, planning and operational capabilities, occurring inside and outside the Union’s territory.
The UCPM is called upon tackle other risks such as pandemics, assistance to people in war zones, major industrial risks, large-scale maritime pollution, consequences of cyber-attacks on electricity or water networks, or management of humanitarian crises linked to immigration.
The link between civil protection (short-term operations) and humanitarian aid (long-term management) needs to be better addressed and coordinated.
The EESC considers that post-disaster action of the EU for events outside its territory needs to be further identified and developed.
The EESC underlines the utmost importance of evolving operational cooperation through harmonisation of training, compatibility of material and equipment, clarity and efficiency of command chains.
The EESC considers that the need to set up a European agency for civil protection and humanitarian aid should be examined and draws attention to the necessary progress to be made with regard to the intervention decision-making process, outside the EU territory.
The EESC considers that the diplomatic dimension of European civil protection is not sufficiently developed. It also questions the definition of the geographical scope of the UCPM and the selection criteria of participating countries and calls for appropriate communication to be encouraged in the international public opinion in order to enhance the UCPM’s action.
The EESC would support the idea of developing joint disaster management first response transnational teams with own resources, joint training and standardisation of resources and equipment.
The EESC encourages a proposal for a legislative amendment to authorise immediate response under the Mechanism in the event of an emergency, without requiring a prior request from the Member State concerned, the Member State retaining the right to refuse such assistance.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
ΚΥΡΙΑ ΣΗΜΕΙΑ Η ΕΟΚΕ: θεωρεί ότι η πρόταση της Επιτροπής είναι ικανοποιητική και δεν χρήζει περαιτέρω σχολίων εκ μέρους της, για αυτό αποφάσισε να εκδώσει θετική γνωμοδότηση για το προτεινόμενο…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
ΚΥΡΙΑ ΣΗΜΕΙΑ: Η ΕΟΚΕ: θεωρεί ότι το σχέδιο REPowerEU της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής αποτελεί βήμα προς τη σωστή κατεύθυνση για να καταστεί η ΕΕ ανεξάρτητη από τον εφοδιασμό με ρωσικό φυσικό αέριο και…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Η ατομική και συλλογική αυτοκατανάλωση ενέργειας ως παράγοντας στον αγώνα για την πράσινη και την ενεργειακή μετάβαση, καθώς και για την οικονομική και κοινωνική ισορροπία Κύρια σημεία Η ΕΟΚΕ:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Θέματα ισότητας και αποτελεσματικότητας για τις θαλάσσιες μεταφορές Κύρια σημεία Η ΕΟΚΕ: υπογραμμίζει ότι η πράσινη μετάβαση του ναυτιλιακού τομέα πρέπει να λαμβάνει υπόψη τα ειδικά ανά χώρα,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Η μετάβαση σε ένα μακροπρόθεσμα βιώσιμο σύστημα μεταφορών ΚΎΡΙΑ ΣΗΜΕΊΑ Η ΕΟΚΕ: θεωρεί ότι οι πολίτες και οι επιχειρήσεις θα στηρίξουν ενεργά τη μετάβαση σε ένα μακροπρόθεσμα…