European Economic
and Social Committee
Towards an EU-Mercosur Association Agreement
Negotiations have resumed for an Association Agreement between the EU and Mercosur, which means there is a need to reassess relations between the two regions and to put forward the positions of organised civil society regarding this agreement.
Signing the Association Agreement would create the world's second largest trade bloc, with an estimated GDP of some EUR 9 trillion and a total population of 700 million. The EESC believes that the agreement would bring immense opportunities and benefits of all kinds for both parties, at a time when enormous changes are taking place in terms of the roles of global players and when we are facing global challenges of a geo-strategic, environmental, and social nature, as well as those relating to energy and governance, and in view of the urgent need to implement in-depth reforms of the development model.
The agreement would also enable the EU to strengthen its trade position in the region, given that China and other Asian countries are increasing their presence on the Latin American market.
Both the EESC and its counterpart in Mercosur's civil society, the FCES (Mercosur Economic and Social Consultative Forum), have always backed negotiations for an Association Agreement, on the understanding that it should be a tool for facilitating regional integration and social cohesion in Mercosur – a partner which shares common values at global level – and for enhancing trade between the two sides.
The EESC believes that an agreement should be balanced, should benefit both parties and should not sacrifice any sector (such as agriculture or industry), region or country. The opinion therefore urges that all possible formulae and mechanisms be used to that end (countervailing clauses, transitional clauses, exceptions, promotion of investments, development etc). The EESC also calls upon the negotiating parties to consider the high political and economic cost of not reaching an agreement and the missed opportunity that this would represent.
The opinion stresses that the AA should be ambitious and should deal with all aspects of the EU's relations with Mercosur. Specifically, the agreement should have a social, labour and environmental dimension that pervades the entire Agreement in order to promote the sustainable development of both regions.
The EESC calls for Mercosur's Economic and Social Consultation Forum (FCES) and the EESC itself – as the bodies representing civil society in the two regions – to be involved in the negotiations, in the impact assessments of the AA and in the proposals arising therefrom.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HLAVNÍ BODY EHSV: se domnívá, že obsah návrhu je uspokojivý, a nemá k němu žádné připomínky, rozhodl se tedy zaujmout k navrhovanému znění příznivé stanovisko.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ HLAVNÍ BODY: EHSV: se domnívá, že plán Evropské komise REPowerEU je krokem správným směrem k…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Podpora úsilí o uskutečnění ekologické a energetické transformace a dosažení hospodářské a sociální rovnováhy prostřednictvím individuální a kolektivní vlastní spotřeby energie Hlavní body EHSV:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Otázka spravedlnosti a účinnosti v oblasti námořní dopravy Hlavní body EHSV: zdůrazňuje, že ekologická transformace odvětví lodní dopravy musí zohledňovat specifické rysy jednotlivých zemí,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Přechod k dlouhodobě udržitelnému dopravnímu systému HLAVNÍ BODY EHSV: domnívá se, že občané a podniky budou přechod k dlouhodobě udržitelnému dopravnímu systému aktivně…