European Economic
and Social Committee
ESF+/Amended proposal
Key points
- The ESF+ is not adequately funded to meet the needs of social cohesion policy. Therefore, the EESC is strongly opposed to reducing the overall financial envelope for the ESF+ for the 2021-2027 period.
- Instead, the EESC reiterates its request for the allocation of 30% of all resources earmarked for economic, social and territorial cohesion policy to the ESF+, and, in addition, for the allocation of 30% of existing resources under the ESF+ to social inclusion measures.
- The EESC is in favour of allowing the ESF+ operations to be co-financed using the Resilience and Recovery Facility. The use of the ESF+ to fund operations in support of the green and digital transformation should be focused on upskilling and reskilling, and be complementary to other European funding under the Multiannual Financial Framework and to the Resilience and Recovery Facility.
- While the allocation of 5% of the ESF+ resources to tackle child poverty is considered an absolute minimum, the proposal to increase the minimum envelope for inclusion of persons not in education, employment or training to 15% is supported.
- Given the role of the ESF+ in implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights, the EESC urges the European Commission to better monitor the social situation of Member States in the European Semester, which should be based on an adequate set of social indicators.
- The EESC insists on allocating enough funding for the capacity building of social partners and other civil society organisations providing services financed by the ESF+.
- The EESC reiterates its request that the social economy becomes a specific stand-alone objective under the ESF+.
- In connection with the removal of the health strand from the ESF, informal carers should be identified as a target group of the ESF+.
- The EESC recommends the introduction of a recital clarifying that there are no restrictions on the access of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants to the measures financed by the ESF+.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: прецени, че съдържанието на предложението е напълно задоволително и не изисква никакви бележки от негова страна, и реши да приеме положително становище по…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ: ЕИСК: счита, че планът REPowerEU на Европейската комисия е стъпка в правилната посока за…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
„Индивидуалното и колективното потребление на собствена енергия като фактор в борбата за екологичен и енергиен преход и за постигането на икономически и социален баланс“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
„Съображения за справедливост и ефективност на морския транспорт“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК: подчертава, че при екологичния преход на сектора на корабоплаването трябва да се вземат предвид…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
TEN/795 — Преходът към дългосрочна устойчива транспортна система ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: счита, че гражданите и предприятията ще подкрепят активно прехода към дългосрочна…