European Economic
and Social Committee
ESF+/Amended proposal
Key points
- The ESF+ is not adequately funded to meet the needs of social cohesion policy. Therefore, the EESC is strongly opposed to reducing the overall financial envelope for the ESF+ for the 2021-2027 period.
- Instead, the EESC reiterates its request for the allocation of 30% of all resources earmarked for economic, social and territorial cohesion policy to the ESF+, and, in addition, for the allocation of 30% of existing resources under the ESF+ to social inclusion measures.
- The EESC is in favour of allowing the ESF+ operations to be co-financed using the Resilience and Recovery Facility. The use of the ESF+ to fund operations in support of the green and digital transformation should be focused on upskilling and reskilling, and be complementary to other European funding under the Multiannual Financial Framework and to the Resilience and Recovery Facility.
- While the allocation of 5% of the ESF+ resources to tackle child poverty is considered an absolute minimum, the proposal to increase the minimum envelope for inclusion of persons not in education, employment or training to 15% is supported.
- Given the role of the ESF+ in implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights, the EESC urges the European Commission to better monitor the social situation of Member States in the European Semester, which should be based on an adequate set of social indicators.
- The EESC insists on allocating enough funding for the capacity building of social partners and other civil society organisations providing services financed by the ESF+.
- The EESC reiterates its request that the social economy becomes a specific stand-alone objective under the ESF+.
- In connection with the removal of the health strand from the ESF, informal carers should be identified as a target group of the ESF+.
- The EESC recommends the introduction of a recital clarifying that there are no restrictions on the access of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants to the measures financed by the ESF+.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTOS CLAVE El CESE: Considerando que el contenido de la propuesta es satisfactorio y no es objeto de ninguna observación por su parte, decidió emitir un dictamen favorable sobre la propuesta.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTOS CLAVE: El CESE: considera que el Plan REPowerEU de la Comisión Europea constituye un paso en la dirección correcta para que la Unión sea independiente del suministro de gas y…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
«El autoconsumo de energía individual y colectivo como factor en la lucha por la transición ecológica y energética y por el equilibrio económico y social» Puntos clave El CESE: considera que los…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Consideraciones de equidad y eficiencia en el transporte marítimo Puntos clave El CESE: subraya que la transición ecológica del sector del transporte marítimo debe tener en cuenta las…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transición hacia un sistema de transporte sostenible a largo plazo PUNTOS CLAVE El CESE: estima que la ciudadanía y las empresas solo apoyarán activamente la transición hacia…