European Economic
and Social Committee
Restrictions for transport operators in Belarus
Key points
- Through this concise opinion the Committee expressed its grave concerns about the authoritarian trajectory of the Belarusian government and condemned acts of repression and intimidation against citizens, the media, political parties, CSOs and the social partners. It also condemned the way the Belarusian government organized the transfer of persons from third countries to its own territory with the aim of forcing the crossing of EU borders. This is an unacceptable act of exploiting the lives and aspirations of vulnerable persons and endangering their health and safety. The Committee therefore welcomed the Commission's proposal and considered possible sanctions on transport operators to be a justified action to be taken by the EU and the Member States.
- The EESC also called for an immediate end to push-backs from the EU territory to a country where the safety of people is in danger. All persons crossing the EU border need to be able to make an asylum claim, if they so wish.
- The Committee urged the Belarusian government to ensure that people present on its territory are not mistreated, can make an asylum claim, and are not returned to their countries of origin if their life and safety is endangered there, in full compliance with the non-refoulement principle.
- Moreover, the EESC encouraged the EU institutions to engage with Belarus on a multilateral basis, ensuring that the country observes the international treaties regulating asylum and human rights protection.
- The EESC emphasized the need to create safe routes for applying to receive international protection and safely migrating under EU, national and international law. The development of safe routes will decrease the need for smugglers and traffickers, and will better protect the safety and rights of all persons involved.
- The EESC urged the EU institutions to devise a more comprehensive system of sanctions against the Belarusian government for its role in this crisis, in which the participation of transport carriers is just one component. The actions on the territory of Belarus could not have been organised without the approval of the highest levels of government and the participation of various state forces, including the border police.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Eftersom kommittén stöder förslaget, som inte föranleder några särskilda kommentarer, beslutade EESK att avge ett positivt yttrande om förslaget.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommittén (EESK) menar att REPowerEU-planen är ett steg i rätt riktning för att göra EU oberoende av försörjning av gas och olja…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuell och kollektiv egenförbrukning av energi som en faktor i kampen för den gröna omställningen och energiomställningen och för ekonomisk och social balans Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rättvise- och effektivitetshänsyn avseende sjötransport Huvudpunkter Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommitténs (EESK) ståndpunkt: Den gröna omställningen inom sjöfartssektorn måste ta hänsyn…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omställningen till ett långsiktigt hållbart transportsystem HUVUDPUNKTER EESK:s ståndpunkt: Medborgare och företag kommer att aktivt stödja omställningen till ett långsiktigt…