European Economic
and Social Committee
Cyber Resilience Act
Key points:
The EESC:
- considers it essential to strengthen the collective response to cyber-attacks and to consolidate the process of harmonising national-level cybersecurity in terms of operational rules and tools, to prevent different national approaches creating legal uncertainties and obstacles;
- considers it important to point out that, while it is commendable that the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers virtually all digital products, its practical application might be problematic given the considerable and complex monitoring and oversight it entails;
- points to the need to clarify precisely the material scope of the CRA, with particular reference to products with digital elements and software;
- points to the need to clarify the criteria that apply to the services provided by the certification authorities in order to take account of the specific needs of SMEs;
- notes that manufacturers will be obliged to report both vulnerabilities in their products and any security incidents, informing the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). In this regard, it will be important that ENISA be provided with the necessary resources to carry out effectively and in a timely manner the important and sensitive tasks entrusted to it;
- suggests that the Commission draw up guidelines to guide manufacturers and consumers on the exact rules and procedures that apply in practice, in order to avoid any uncertainty when it comes to interpretation of this legislative proposal vis-a vis other legislation on cybersecurity;
- notes that the relationship between the certification authorities under the CRA and other bodies authorised to certify cybersecurity under other legislation, as well as the operational coordination between the surveillance authorities provided for in this proposal and those already operating in accordance with other legislation applicable to the same products are not entirely clear.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
De transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de lange termijn HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: meent dat burgers en bedrijven de transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de…