European Economic
and Social Committee
Cyber Resilience Act
Key points:
The EESC:
- considers it essential to strengthen the collective response to cyber-attacks and to consolidate the process of harmonising national-level cybersecurity in terms of operational rules and tools, to prevent different national approaches creating legal uncertainties and obstacles;
- considers it important to point out that, while it is commendable that the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers virtually all digital products, its practical application might be problematic given the considerable and complex monitoring and oversight it entails;
- points to the need to clarify precisely the material scope of the CRA, with particular reference to products with digital elements and software;
- points to the need to clarify the criteria that apply to the services provided by the certification authorities in order to take account of the specific needs of SMEs;
- notes that manufacturers will be obliged to report both vulnerabilities in their products and any security incidents, informing the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). In this regard, it will be important that ENISA be provided with the necessary resources to carry out effectively and in a timely manner the important and sensitive tasks entrusted to it;
- suggests that the Commission draw up guidelines to guide manufacturers and consumers on the exact rules and procedures that apply in practice, in order to avoid any uncertainty when it comes to interpretation of this legislative proposal vis-a vis other legislation on cybersecurity;
- notes that the relationship between the certification authorities under the CRA and other bodies authorised to certify cybersecurity under other legislation, as well as the operational coordination between the surveillance authorities provided for in this proposal and those already operating in accordance with other legislation applicable to the same products are not entirely clear.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
KLJUČNE TOČKE EGSO: prihvaća sadržaj prijedloga i smatra da njegov komentar nije potreban, te je odlučio o njemu dati pozitivno mišljenje.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
KLJUČNE TOČKE: EGSO: smatra da je plan REPowerEU Europske komisije korak u pravom smjeru prema neovisnosti EU-a o ruskoj opskrbi plinom i naftom; ističe da su se mnogi problemi koje sada treba…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Pojedinačna i kolektivna potrošnja vlastite energije kao čimbenik u borbi za zelenu i energetsku tranziciju te gospodarsku i socijalnu ravnotežu Ključne točke EGSO: smatra da bi lokalne i…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Pitanja pravednosti i učinkovitosti u pomorskom prijevozu Ključne točke EGSO: naglašava da se zelenom tranzicijom sektora pomorskog prijevoza moraju uzeti u obzir značajke specifične za pojedinu…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prelazak na dugoročno održiv prometni sustav KLJUČNE TOČKE EGSO: smatra da će građani i poduzeća aktivno podupirati prelazak na dugoročno održiv prometni sustav samo ako njegova…