Opinions with Civil Society Organisations - Group III members as rapporteur/co-rapporteur/rapporteur-general

  • přijatá stanoviska on 31/05/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Odkaz
    ECO/428-EESC-2017-00072-00-00-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Italy

    The EESC supports the measures that the European Union has put in place to tackle all forms of tax fraud and takes the view that the reverse charge mechanism for collecting value added tax (VAT) may be a useful tool in countering carousel fraud and VAT evasion. However, the use of the reverse charge mechanism, which is a derogation from the established principles on VAT, must not be allowed to harm the internal market and it must be temporary and properly assessed by the Commission.

    The Committee furthermore recommends focusing particular attention on the proportionality principle, as the cost of compliance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) related to introducing a reverse charge mechanism could be considerable.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: VAT derogation - reverse charge
  • přijatá stanoviska on 31/05/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Odkaz
    INT/812-EESC-2017-00509-00-00-AC-TRA
    (Sweden
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Sweden

    Normal 0 21 false false false FR-BE X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: Europe's next leaders: the Start-up and Scale-up Initiative
  • přijatá stanoviska on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Odkaz
    TEN/622-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany
    (Sweden
    • Cooperation between EU Member States under the RES Directive
    • Design features of support schemes for renewable electricity
    • Mid-term evaluation of the Renewable Energy Directive
    Download — stanovisko EHSV: Revision of the Renewable Energies Directive
  • přijatá stanoviska on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Odkaz
    REX/484-EESC-2017
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Romania
    (Romania

    The 2030 Agenda, the new global framework for sustainable development agreed by the UN in 2015, needs to be reflected in EU's development policy, the major orientations of which are set out in the 2005 European Consensus on Development ("the Consensus").

    To this end, the Commission issued Communication COM(2016) 740, "Proposal for a New European Consensus on Development: Our World, Our Dignity, Our Future" in November 2016.  Interinstitutional negotiations are expected to result in its endorsement in the form of a Joint Statement by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission, in May 2017.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: Proposal for a new European Consensus on Development: "Our World, our Dignity, our Future” (Communication)
  • přijatá stanoviska on 26/04/2017 - Bureau decision date: 13/12/2016
    Odkaz
    TEN/620-EESC-2017
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Latvia
    Workers - GR II
    Spain
  • přijatá stanoviska on 23/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Odkaz
    NAT/689-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany

    This exploratory opinion was drawn up at the request of the European Commission in the framework of the mid-term evaluation of the LIFE programme over the 2014-2020 period. It reiterates the support of the European civil society in favour of an independent budget line dedicated to the environment and looks at possible options for improving LIFE after 2020.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: Mid-term evaluation of the LIFE Programme
  • přijatá stanoviska on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Odkaz
    REX/478-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Romania

    The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) believes that the European Agenda on Migration should be designed so as to take into full consideration the humanitarian dimension of its scope, and the EU should not forget its fundamental commitments and legally binding rules to protect lives and human rights, especially of people in danger. The EESC supports the vision to provide a long-term response to migration, addressing the root causes of migration and creating a dialogue with third countries based on cooperation and shared responsibility. Tailored and specific agreements with each country, with full respect of human rights are also supporter. Flexibility provides the right perspective and combination of actions and incentives.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: Establishing a new Partnership Framework with third countries under the European Agenda on Migration
  • přijatá stanoviska on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Odkaz
    SOC/555-EESC-2016-05262-00-00-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Malta

    The EESC is pleased that the Maltese Presidency has chosen "High quality education for all" as an priority theme. However, the EESC fears that the value of this initiative could be lost when austerity measures still apply to many of our societies, hindering them to fully benefit from high quality education. Europe should not forget the essential role played by high quality education for all in building up a European society committed to upholding fundamental rights and values.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: High-quality education for all
  • přijatá stanoviska on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 17/02/2016
    Odkaz
    SOC/537-EESC-2016-00747-00-01-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Poland

    The EESC advocates the creation of an integrated European fund to combat poverty and social exclusion, based on the experiences of the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) and the European Social Fund (ESF). The current use of the ESF and the FEAD in the Member States should be monitored more effectively and the process should involve civil society organisations. Member States should make greater use of global grants and regranting, and treat in-kind contributions on an equal footing with financial contributions. A greater share of the resources allocated to operational programmes should be earmarked for projects with smaller budgets. The EESC is ready to develop – in cooperation with CSOs – a consultation platform to ensure better coordination of ESF and FEAD interventions and to enable discussion on the basic principles of a future integrated EU fund.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: The effectiveness of ESF and FEAD funding as part of civil society efforts to tackle poverty and social exclusion under the Europe 2020 strategy (own-initiative opinion)
  • přijatá stanoviska on 25/01/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Odkaz
    SOC/548-EESC-2016-05234-00-00-ac
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany

    The Committee supports the European Commission proposal for the creation of a Union Resettlement Framework and calls for a genuine common asylum policy that respects European values. It calls for the common criteria for resettlement to focus on people's need for protection, not on the third country's effective cooperation on asylum and it considers the "first country of asylum" and "safe third country" concepts to be open to question due to the current unsafe and unstable situation in the third countries and regions concerned. The Committee calls for the resettlement programme to be uncoupled from partnership agreements that aim to encourage third countries to prevent refugees from fleeing, as this carries the risk of infringing international law and fundamental rights.

    Download — stanovisko EHSV: EU Resettlement Framework