Opinions with Civil Society Organisations - Group III members as rapporteur/co-rapporteur/rapporteur-general

  • Przyjęte on 26/10/2011
    Sygnatura
    NAT/517-EESC-2011-1603
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Spain
    Plenary session number
    475
    -
    Download — EESC Opinion: Recovery plan for bluefin tuna
  • Przyjęte on 26/10/2011
    Sygnatura
    INT/589-EESC-2011-1584
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Sweden
    Plenary session number
    475
    -

    Social enterprise is a key element of the European social model and fundamental for the success of the EU2020 strategy. By supporting and promoting social enterprise, Europe strengthens its growth and competitiveness potential and its capacity to create social value. The EESC supports the Commission's launch of a political framework and action plan to promote social enterprise in Europe. In its opinion, it stresses the importance of its implementation at both EU and Member State level as well.

    Download — EESC opinion: Social entrepreneurship and social enterprise
  • Przyjęte on 26/10/2011
    Sygnatura
    NAT/491-EESC-2011-1600
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany
    Plenary session number
    475
    -
    Download — EESC Opinion: Biodiversity – Strategy 2020
  • Przyjęte on 26/10/2011
    Sygnatura
    TEN/457-EESC-2011-1608
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Portugal
    Plenary session number
    475
    -
    Download — Net Neutrality
  • Przyjęte on 26/10/2011
    Sygnatura
    TEN/460-EESC-2011-1610
    Workers - GR II
    Belgium
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    France
    Plenary session number
    475
    -
    Download — Directive on energy efficiency
  • Przyjęte on 26/10/2011
    Sygnatura
    CCMI/87-EESC-2011-1597
    Workers - GR II
    Romania
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Poland
    In the framework of this opinion a hearing (The processing and exploitation, for economic and environmental purposes, of the industrial and mining waste deposits from European Union) was organized in Cluj Napoca / Kolozsvár, in Romania, on 19 May 2011.
    Download — The processing and exploitation, for economic and environmental purposes of the industrial and mining waste deposits from European Union
  • Przyjęte on 22/09/2011
    Sygnatura
    INT/584-EESC-2011-1376
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Spain
    Plenary session number
    474
    -
    Download — EESC opinion: Temporary suspension of autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties / Canary Islands
  • Przyjęte on 22/09/2011
    Sygnatura
    NAT/514-EESC-2011-1389
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    United Kingdom
    Employers - GR I
    Czech Republic
    Plenary session number
    474
    -

    The Committee recommends the Commission to bring forward a comprehensive new package of measures to incentivise the massive new investment needed to deliver these new targets. The package should include a strengthening of the ETS as a cost optimising instrument for guiding investment decisions as well as other measures to: 1) promote energy efficiency in all sectors; 2) increase consumer awareness and capacity to use their purchasing power to favour low carbon goods and services; 3) support investment in the infrastructure that will be needed; 4) promote training and capacity-building in the key sectors.

    Download — EESC Opinion: Low Carbon Economy Roadmap 2050
  • Przyjęte on 22/09/2011
    Sygnatura
    NAT/500-EESC-2011-1387
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Spain
    Plenary session number
    474
    -
    Download — EESC Opinion: The future of young farmers
  • Przyjęte on 22/09/2011
    Sygnatura
    NAT/498-EESC-2011-1385
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany
    Plenary session number
    474
    -

    It agrees with the Commission that the EU 2020 Strategy must pave the way for longer-term goals from now until 2050 and beyond. It wonders, however, why the Commission is coupling this flagship initiative with the EU 2020 Strategy, rather than putting it forward as a concrete expression of the sustainable development strategy, which would make much more sense.

    Download — EESC Opinion: Resource efficient Europe