European Economic
and Social Committee
Role of carbon removal technologies in decarbonising the European industry
Link to follow the hearing on 20 April 2022. This hearing is linked to the first meeting of the study group, taking place on the same day.
The adoption of the European Union Climate law has set an ambitious emission reduction target for 2030 while confirming the climate neutrality objective for 2050. According to the IPCC scenarios, keeping global warming below 1.5°C requires that global anthropogenic net emissions should be zero by around 2050. Secondly, meeting this goal requires the deployment of CDR, which can happen by means of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and removals in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector. The IPCC defines CDR as "anthropogenic activities removing CO2 from the atmosphere and durably storing it in geological, terrestrial, or ocean reservoirs, or in products".
The less rapid and stringent the GHG emissions reductions are, the stronger the dependence on CDR for meeting the targets of the Paris Agreement. Depending on when CDR is deployed, it can serve two different purposes: i) either accelerate the achievement of net-zero emissions by compensating for those from harder-to-abate sectors and thus increase the likelihood of staying within the temperature thresholds; or ii) bring global warming below the thresholds following a temperature peak above them (an overshoot).
Among CDR practices, it is worth distinguishing nature-based solutions including forestation, soil
management, biochar and wetland restoration, and CDR technologies such as enhanced weathering, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air capture with CCS (DACCS).
The Fit for 55 legislative package indirectly promotes certain CDR technologies without proposing an integrated strategy whereas CDR technologies at industrial scale will be crucial to meet the 2050 climate neutrality objective. Moreover, these technologies pose a series of challenges, in terms of the adverse social and environmental effects of social acceptance. Last but not least, the industrial CDR technologies can create lead value chains in Europe if the EU is among the first mover in developing these complementary solutions.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
De transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de lange termijn HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: meent dat burgers en bedrijven de transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de…