European Economic
and Social Committee
Renewed InvestEU programme and Solvency Support Instrument
Key points
The EESC:
- welcomes the strengthening of the InvestEU programme and the complementary Solvency Support Instrument (SSI) and calls for swift agreement on these proposals to ensure that both programmes can be made operational quickly and that a sufficient number of eligible projects can be developed to benefit from them;
- asks the legislators to make provisions to ensure that there will not be a funding gap after 2026 and before the start of the MFF post-2027;
- underlines that the COVID-19 crisis does not steer the EU away from its medium and long-term objectives, as outlined in the European Green Deal, the 2020 Sustainable Growth Strategy and the European Pillar for Social Rights;
- considers the InvestEU programme to be especially well-placed to provide long-term funding and to support Union policies in the recovery from a deep economic and social crisis;
- stresses the importance of having a clear definition of which projects are eligible to benefit from the new fifth window, as this is crucial to create complementarity with the other four policy windows;
- advocates for a wider definition of innovation that goes beyond information technology and digitalisation;
- considers that Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and in particular micro- and small enterprises, should be explicitly eligible for support under the new fifth window;
- calls for specific and clear guidelines aimed at identifying projects eligible to benefit from InvestEU, as well as on the possibilities for synergies between the numerous EU programmes, thereby ensuring their adequate and efficient implementation;
- welcomes the new Solvency Support Instrument and underlines the importance of ensuring that it can indeed benefit those Member States whose economies have been most affected by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic;
- underlines the role of the European financial markets in ensuring that these instruments can mobilise the expected amounts of investment, as well as the leading role of the European Investment Bank Group (EIB and European Investment Fund (EIF)) and the considerable need for an appropriate structure for the implementing partners, especially at national level.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
De transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de lange termijn HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: meent dat burgers en bedrijven de transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de…