European Economic
and Social Committee
Coordination of social security systems
Key points
The EESC concluded that:
- the proposal for a new Regulation on the coordination of social security systems should be aimed at facilitating the movement of jobseekers and workers, not restricting it;
- the aim of this exercise should be to achieve a fair balance between home and host countries;
- the new rules do not establish a new entitlement to long-term care in every Member State, as this depends on the existence of such services in the host country;
- the terminology uses in the proposal for the revision of the Regulation on Social Security Coordination with the use of the Posting of Workers Directive;
- the proposed requirement to work at least 3 months in the host Member State before a worker can qualify for unemployment benefits will delay the "aggregation of periods" giving the right to benefits;
- it is unclear how the proposal to extend the period for "exporting" unemployment benefits from the current 3 to at least 6 months can provide employment opportunities for jobseekers, as this will depend on the labour market situation;
- greater convergence in terms of benefits, aggregation and activation would help improve and facilitate the coordination of social security systems.
- the public employment services (PES) ought to be more effective in supporting mobile jobseekers to find suitable work;
- there is need for a stronger commitment on the part of the Member States to facilitate the option of allowing mobile citizens who are economically inactive to contribute to a scheme for health coverage in the host Member State and to consider the advantages of receiving mobile citizens in general, which contribute to the economy and cultural diversity of the host country;
- nothing in the proposed new rules should restrict the fundamental rights recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
De transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de lange termijn HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: meent dat burgers en bedrijven de transitie naar een duurzaam vervoerssysteem voor de…