European Economic
and Social Committee
The competitiveness of the EU’s small and medium-sized enterprises in light of new administrative burdens/obligations
EESC exploratory opinion at the request of the Polish Presidency of the Council of the EU on The competitiveness of the EU’s small and medium-sized enterprises in light of new administrative burdens/obligations (e.g. relating to non-financial reporting)
Key points
The EESC:
- considers that, despite the launch of different EU initiatives in the past, further improvements on the reduction of the regulatory burden are still required, given that SMEs are facing double and triple legislative requirements as a result of the additional wave of regulation and existing requirements, also in relation to the Green Deal;
- takes the view, at the same time, that reducing the regulatory burden must not jeopardise compliance with social, environmental and consumer safety rights and standards established at international and EU levels, as well as with the principle of transparency and the rule of law in the EU;
- recommends that the Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB) is significantly strengthened and made more independent, by carrying out a ‘consistency and subsidiarity check’ at the beginning of each legislative process and being empowered with appropriate revision and advisory rights;
- recommends that the SME test and the competitiveness check should be merged into one procedure;
- recommends making use of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to create an easy-to-use ‘single reporting tool’ that can provide SMEs, mid-caps and other companies with all EU-relevant reporting obligations, deadlines and sanctions;
- points out the need for the European Parliament and the Council of the EU to develop an expedited procedure for impact and risk assessments carried out by their own policy departments in the case of amendments that would substantially reshape the proposals adopted by the European Commission;
- believes that the Council of the EU and national authorities should also make greater use of the opportunities for reviewing responsibilities (subsidiarity), particularly with regard to the impact on SMEs, consumers, administration and justice.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat
Downloads
-
Record of Proceedings INT/1075
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1075
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
Open Dag van de Europese instellingen
Event
Op zaterdag 6 mei kon het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité (EESC) samen met de andere EU-instellingen in Brussel voor het eerst sinds de COVID-19-crisis zijn deuren weer openen ter gelegenheid…