European Economic
and Social Committee
Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (communication)
Key points:
- The EESC generally welcomes the findings of the Fitness Check of the Nature Directives, which indicate that the directives are fulfilling their purpose as pillars of a wider biodiversity policy, but that their implementation must be substantially improved.
- Even if each of the 15 proposed measures of the new action plan is well-founded, the plan is confusing. There is little clarity about how it relates to the existing biodiversity strategy, especially since a lot of the content overlaps and there are only very few new features. The EESC feels it would have made more sense to evaluate, and where necessary enhance, the existing biodiversity strategy.
- The critical issue for an effective biodiversity policy must be that measures to promote biodiversity today largely represent a cost factor rather than a source of revenue for land owners and users. Measures must make economic sense for those who are to put them into effect. None of the programmes introduced by the EU and the Member States to date have been able to resolve this fundamental dilemma; nor unfortunately does the action plan, in which "win-win" positions are often invoked, offer any useful approaches.
- Lack of financing is not just a major obstacle to achieving the agreed biodiversity targets, but is symptomatic of the failures of EU policy. Laws are adopted that entail costs, but no agreement is reached on who must pay or how these costs are to be covered.
- The EESC again urges the European Commission to produce an up-to-date estimate of costs for the Natura 2000 network. The constantly EUR 6.1 billion as the amount of resources needed for Natura 2000 is in our view inaccurate; we think that the actual need double to three times that figure.
- The EESC therefore believes it is imperative to set out a long-term strategy for meeting the financing needs of biodiversity policy. The appropriate context for this would be the discussion about the post-2021 financial perspective, but neither the action plan nor the approaches set out in the Reflection Paper on the Future of EU finances indicate that the situation could be substantially improved.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Bearta trédhearcachta
Basic Page
Rinne Biúró CESE cinneadh i bprionsabal an 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 go nglacfadh CESE páirt i gClár Trédhearcachta an Aontais Eorpaigh a bunaíodh faoi Chomhaontú Idirinstitiúideach an 20 Bealtaine…
Litir oscailte chomhpháirteach ó Ghrúpa Eagraíochtaí na Sochaí Sibhialta in CESE agus ó Shochaí Shibhialta na hEorpa #EUCivilDialogueNow
Event
PREASEISIÚINT Ní mór d’institiúidí an Aontais an Conradh ar an Aontas Eorpach a urramú agus idirphlé sibhialta struchtúrtha a chur chun feidhme An 24 Eanáir, sheol sochaí shibhialta na hEorpa litir…
Toghadh Séamus Boland ina Uachtarán ar Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa, agus gheall sé go gcuirfear an tsochaí shibhialta i gcroílár na hEorpa
News
Toghadh Séamus Boland na hÉireann ar an 35ú Uachtarán ar Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa (CESE) le haghaidh an téarma oifige 2025-2028. Is urlabhra riamh anall é do phobail na tuaithe…
Eolas faoi CESE
Basic Page
‘Beidh Coiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta (...) a fheidhmeoidh feidhmeanna comhairliúcháin de chúnamh ag Parlaimint na hEorpa, ag an gComhairle agus ag an gCoimisiún.’1957, Airteagal 13 den Chonradh…
CESE, Uachtarántacht na hÉireann agus an fhís choiteann atá acu
News
I ndiaidh na díospóireachta a reáchtáladh le Comhaltaí CESE le linn sheisiún iomlánach mhí Iúil, níl aon dabht faoi ach go bhfuil clár Uachtaránacht reatha an Aontais ag freagairt go mór do na…