European Economic
and Social Committee
Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (communication)
Key points:
- The EESC generally welcomes the findings of the Fitness Check of the Nature Directives, which indicate that the directives are fulfilling their purpose as pillars of a wider biodiversity policy, but that their implementation must be substantially improved.
- Even if each of the 15 proposed measures of the new action plan is well-founded, the plan is confusing. There is little clarity about how it relates to the existing biodiversity strategy, especially since a lot of the content overlaps and there are only very few new features. The EESC feels it would have made more sense to evaluate, and where necessary enhance, the existing biodiversity strategy.
- The critical issue for an effective biodiversity policy must be that measures to promote biodiversity today largely represent a cost factor rather than a source of revenue for land owners and users. Measures must make economic sense for those who are to put them into effect. None of the programmes introduced by the EU and the Member States to date have been able to resolve this fundamental dilemma; nor unfortunately does the action plan, in which "win-win" positions are often invoked, offer any useful approaches.
- Lack of financing is not just a major obstacle to achieving the agreed biodiversity targets, but is symptomatic of the failures of EU policy. Laws are adopted that entail costs, but no agreement is reached on who must pay or how these costs are to be covered.
- The EESC again urges the European Commission to produce an up-to-date estimate of costs for the Natura 2000 network. The constantly EUR 6.1 billion as the amount of resources needed for Natura 2000 is in our view inaccurate; we think that the actual need double to three times that figure.
- The EESC therefore believes it is imperative to set out a long-term strategy for meeting the financing needs of biodiversity policy. The appropriate context for this would be the discussion about the post-2021 financial perspective, but neither the action plan nor the approaches set out in the Reflection Paper on the Future of EU finances indicate that the situation could be substantially improved.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
KESKEISET KOHDAT: ETSK katsoo, että asiakirjan sisältö on hyväksyttävä eikä sillä ole siihen kommentoitavaa, ja päätti antaa esitetystä asiakirjasta myönteisen lausunnon.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
KESKEISET KOHDAT: ETSK katsoo, että Euroopan komission esittämä REPowerEU-suunnitelma on askel oikeaan suuntaan sen tavoitteen saavuttamiseksi, että EU olisi tulevaisuudessa riippumaton Venäjän…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Energian tuotanto omaan ja yhteiskäyttöön vihreän siirtymän ja energiakäänteen sekä taloudellisen ja sosiaalisen tasapainon edistäjänä Keskeiset kohdat ETSK katsoo, että alue- ja…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Meriliikenteen tasapuolisuus- ja tehokkuusnäkökohtia Keskeiset kohdat ETSK korostaa, että merenkulkualan vihreässä siirtymässä on otettava huomioon maakohtaiset, alakohtaiset ja…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Siirtyminen pitkän aikavälin kestävään liikennejärjestelmään KESKEISET KOHDAT ETSK katsoo, että kansalaiset ja yritykset tukevat aktiivisesti siirtymistä pitkän aikavälin…