European Economic
and Social Committee
Protection status of the wolf
Key points
The EESC:
- Stresses the importance of promoting coexistence between wolves, rural communities, and livestock farmers through balanced management, rather than relying on elimination.
- Highlights scientific evidence showing that widespread disposal of wolves is ineffective in reducing conflict unless done at unsustainable levels, which would violate EU conservation law.
- Advocates for the use of proven protective strategies, such as fencing, guard dogs, and herders, which help reduce predation while maintaining the species’ favourable conservation status.
- Recommends leveraging EU and national funding to support farmers in implementing effective protection measures, especially in high-risk areas or where significant damage has occurred.
- Proposes swift compensation not only for direct losses like animal deaths but also for indirect impacts such as scattered herds, miscarriages, and lost income.
- Stresses the importance of advising farmers on livestock protection, training public officials in damage assessment, and fostering peer-to-peer learning among livestock producers.
- Calls for a coordinated EU-level protocol for the selective removal of problematic wolves, to be used only under exceptional circumstances and in compliance with EU legislation.
- Recommends the creation of an EU-level dialogue bringing together institutions, Member States, farmers, scientists, NGOs, and local communities to share knowledge and discuss management practices.
- Notes the important role wolves play in controlling wild ungulate populations and restoring ecological balance, while underlining the uneven conservation status across regions.
- Urges Member States to enhance monitoring of wolf populations and behaviours, prevent hybridisation with dogs, and crack down on illegal killings through targeted enforcement and public awareness.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: прецени, че съдържанието на предложението е напълно задоволително и не изисква никакви бележки от негова страна, и реши да приеме положително становище по…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ: ЕИСК: счита, че планът REPowerEU на Европейската комисия е стъпка в правилната посока за…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
„Индивидуалното и колективното потребление на собствена енергия като фактор в борбата за екологичен и енергиен преход и за постигането на икономически и социален баланс“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
„Съображения за справедливост и ефективност на морския транспорт“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК: подчертава, че при екологичния преход на сектора на корабоплаването трябва да се вземат предвид…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
TEN/795 — Преходът към дългосрочна устойчива транспортна система ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ ЕИСК: счита, че гражданите и предприятията ще подкрепят активно прехода към дългосрочна…