Protection status of the wolf

Key points

The EESC:

  • Stresses the importance of promoting coexistence between wolves, rural communities, and livestock farmers through balanced management, rather than relying on elimination.
  • Highlights scientific evidence showing that widespread disposal of wolves is ineffective in reducing conflict unless done at unsustainable levels, which would violate EU conservation law.
  • Advocates for the use of proven protective strategies, such as fencing, guard dogs, and herders, which help reduce predation while maintaining the species’ favourable conservation status.
  • Recommends leveraging EU and national funding to support farmers in implementing effective protection measures, especially in high-risk areas or where significant damage has occurred.
  • Proposes swift compensation not only for direct losses like animal deaths but also for indirect impacts such as scattered herds, miscarriages, and lost income.
  • Stresses the importance of advising farmers on livestock protection, training public officials in damage assessment, and fostering peer-to-peer learning among livestock producers.
  • Calls for a coordinated EU-level protocol for the selective removal of problematic wolves, to be used only under exceptional circumstances and in compliance with EU legislation.
  • Recommends the creation of an EU-level dialogue bringing together institutions, Member States, farmers, scientists, NGOs, and local communities to share knowledge and discuss management practices.
  • Notes the important role wolves play in controlling wild ungulate populations and restoring ecological balance, while underlining the uneven conservation status across regions.
  • Urges Member States to enhance monitoring of wolf populations and behaviours, prevent hybridisation with dogs, and crack down on illegal killings through targeted enforcement and public awareness.

Downloads

Download — Становище на ЕИСК: Protection status of the wolf

Recommended for you

  • Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC

    Opinion

    ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ     ЕИСК: прецени, че съдържанието на предложението е напълно задоволително и не изисква никакви бележки от негова страна, и реши да приеме положително становище по…

  • RePowerEU Plan

    Opinion

    PRACTICAL INFORMATION Administrator: Layla REITER, Assistant: Virginie ANDRÉ  ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ: ЕИСК: счита, че планът REPowerEU на Европейската комисия е стъпка в правилната посока за…

  • Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance

    Opinion

    „Индивидуалното и колективното потребление на собствена енергия като фактор в борбата за екологичен и енергиен преход и за постигането на икономически и социален баланс“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК:…

  • Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation

    Opinion

    „Съображения за справедливост и ефективност на морския транспорт“ Основни аспекти ЕИСК: подчертава, че при екологичния преход на сектора на корабоплаването трябва да се вземат предвид…

  • The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system

    Opinion

    TEN/795 — Преходът към дългосрочна устойчива транспортна система   ОСНОВНИ АСПЕКТИ   ЕИСК:   счита, че гражданите и предприятията ще подкрепят активно прехода към дългосрочна…