European Economic
and Social Committee
A new framework for free trade agreements, economic partnership and investment agreements that guarantees the real involvement of CSOs and the social partners and ensures public awareness
Key points
- The COVID-19 crisis has had an unprecedented impact on the global economy, trade and investment. The crisis has brought about major upheaval worldwide and sparked a debate on the need to overhaul national and European trade and industrial policies, by upgrading and guaranteeing "strategic production" (in areas such as health, pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, transport, etc.).
- The EU's decision to promote the dual digital and green-economy transitions will inevitably have consequences for European trade policies. In this context, the tools of the European trade policy need to be revamped. Among these instruments, the EU's bilateral free trade, economic partnership and investment agreements play a particularly important role.
- The EESC, civil society and the social partners wish to be properly and more closely involved in the various stages of bilateral trade (or investment or economic partnership) agreements between the European Union and other trading partner countries, including:
- negotiations;
- agreement's impact assessment;
- stakeholder consultation;
- drafting;
- monitoring of the agreement's implementation.
- This proposal aims to preserve transparency of the agreement's negotiating process, while ensuring its confidentiality.
- The new, more effective framework should enable a proper involvement of the civil society during the various negotiation phases, as well as during the implementation of the bilateral trade (or investment or economic partnership) agreements. According to the proposal, a Memorandum of Understanding between the EC and partner countries would be signed at the beginning of the negotiations, committing them to ensure transparency of the process, and engaging with social partners as observers with certain rights and obligations.
- The observers would be appointed in a balanced way, ensuring the representativeness of various groups of interest.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: stemt in met het voorstel, heeft er geen commentaar op en heeft daarom besloten er een positief advies over uit te brengen.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOOFDPUNTEN Het EESC: beschouwt het REPowerEU-plan van de Europese Commissie als een stap in de goede richting om de EU onafhankelijk te maken van de Russische gas- en olielevering; wijst erop…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueel en collectief zelfverbruik van energie als factor in de strijd voor de groene en energietransitie en voor economisch en sociaal evenwicht Hoofdpunten Het EESC: is van mening dat de…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Rechtvaardigheid en efficiëntie in het zeevervoer Hoofdpunten Het EESC: onderstreept dat de groene transitie van de scheepvaartsector rekening moet houden met landspecifieke, sectorspecifieke en…
Open Dag van de Europese instellingen
Event
Op zaterdag 6 mei kon het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité (EESC) samen met de andere EU-instellingen in Brussel voor het eerst sinds de COVID-19-crisis zijn deuren weer openen ter gelegenheid…