European Economic
and Social Committee
Common Provisions Regulation 2021-2027
Key points:
The EESC
- strongly rejects the Commission's proposal to cut the EU's budget by 10% in real terms and urges the Member States (MS) to find solutions that allow this budget to be kept at the same level as the 2014-2020 programming period;
- finds that the economic circumstances set up by the CPR (macro-economic conditionalities, decreased co-financing etc.) could harm investment and therefore:
- rejects macro-economic conditionality for penalising regions and citizens;
- invites the Commission to maintain the decommitment rule at N+3;
- asks the Commission to reconsider increasing the co-financing rates;
- appreciates the efforts regarding simplification, flexibility and effectiveness. It is however unfortunate that the new rulebook is not a single set of rules;
- finds the rules related to thematic concentration too strict. It proposes that one of the policy objectives should be chosen by the MS;
- recommends that the Commission develop the required tools that allow areas with structural and permanent disadvantages (islands, mountain regions etc.) to effectively tackle their specific and complex challenges;
- recommends that ad-hoc solutions be found for those countries or regions which were classified as convergence regions during the 2007-2013 programme benefitting from an 80% co-financing rate during the 2014-2020 period and which will now be classified as transition regions during the 2021-2027 period benefitting from a 55% co-financing rate;
- believes that the Commission should further reinforce synergies by finding a way to reintegrate the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development into the rulebook and also by strengthening ties with the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+);
- takes note of the dissatisfaction of the European Social Partners concerning the Code of Conduct, and asks that it be revised and updated in direct consultation with them. It also asks that the Code of Conduct be made binding;
- rejects the removal from the new CRP proposal of the principles of promotion of equality between men and women, non-discrimination, accessibility of persons with disabilities, as well as of sustainable development.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK: remdamasis tuo, kad pasiūlymas yra visiškai priimtinas ir kad dėl jo neturi pastabų, nusprendė pateikti palankią nuomonę dėl siūlomo dokumento.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad Europos Komisijos planas „REPowerEU“ yra žingsnis teisinga linkme siekiant, kad ES taptų nepriklausoma nuo Rusijos dujų ir naftos tiekimo; pabrėžia, kad daugelio…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualus ir kolektyvinis pasigamintos energijos vartojimas kaip žaliosios ir energetikos pertvarkos ir ekonominės ir socialinės pusiausvyros veiksnys Dokumento esmė EESRK mano, kad vietos ir…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Jūrų transporto teisingumo ir veiksmingumo aspektai Dokumento esmė EESRK pabrėžia, kad vykdant žaliąją pertvarką laivybos sektoriuje būtina atsižvelgti į konkrečioms šalims, konkretiems…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Perėjimas prie ilgalaikės tvarios transporto sistemos DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad piliečiai ir įmonės tik tuo atveju aktyviai rems perėjimą prie ilgalaikės tvarios transporto…